Capacitance between a wire and a plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance between a wire and an infinite plane using Gauss's law and potential theory. The initial approach contained several errors, including incorrect integration paths and assumptions about the electric field. The corrected process involves calculating the electric fields generated by both the wire and the plane, leading to the total potential and capacitance per length of the wire. The final capacitance expression is derived as C = (2πε₀(d²+y²)/(adz)) - 2πε₀ln(a/√((z-d)²+y²)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with potential energy and capacitance concepts
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, including charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of images in electrostatics for complex charge configurations
  • Learn about the derivation of capacitance for different geometries, including cylindrical and planar systems
  • Explore advanced integration techniques relevant to electric field calculations
  • Investigate the effects of boundary conditions on electric fields and potentials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, capacitance calculations, and electric field theory.

Kelly Lin
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


L6p8PMS.png


Homework Equations


I want to know whether my process is correct?
THANKS!

The Attempt at a Solution


OvAZ5dF.png
[/B]
1. By using Gauss's law:
E\cdot 2\pi rz = \frac{\lambda z}{\epsilon_{0}}\Rightarrow E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0} r}
In my coordinate system, E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}[y^{2}+(z-d)^{2}]^{-1/2}}
Then,
V=-\int\mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=-\int_{0}^{z}\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}[y^{2}+(z-d)^{2}]^{-1/2}}dz=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}y}\ln{\frac{\left | \sqrt{d^{2}+y^{2}}-d \right |}{\left | \sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}+(z-d) \right |}}
Since C=\frac{Q}{V}, then
<br /> C(\text{per length})=2\pi\epsilon_{0}y\ln{\frac{\left | \sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}+(z-d) \right |}{\left | \sqrt{d^{2}+y^{2}}-d \right |}}<br />
2.
Use \sigma=-\epsilon\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}|_{z=0} to get the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kelly Lin said:
whether my process is correct?
No, several errors.
You have written the expression for the field at some arbitrary point, (y, z).
First problem: the expression would be correct without the plate. Perhaps the charge distribution on the plate changes it?
Second problem: you integrate this wrt z,but leaving y as arbitrary. What path is that along?
Note that it would be simpler to run the integral in the other direction, avoiding the d-z.
Third problem: if you fix the second problem, you will get an integral that diverges at the wire end. You need to take into account the radius of the wire.
Fourth problem. You have z as a bound on the integral. What should it be?
 
haruspex said:
No, several errors.
You have written the expression for the field at some arbitrary point, (y, z).
First problem: the expression would be correct without the plate. Perhaps the charge distribution on the plate changes it?
Second problem: you integrate this wrt z,but leaving y as arbitrary. What path is that along?
Note that it would be simpler to run the integral in the other direction, avoiding the d-z.
Third problem: if you fix the second problem, you will get an integral that diverges at the wire end. You need to take into account the radius of the wire.
Fourth problem. You have z as a bound on the integral. What should it be?

Now, I correct my process!
Firstly, the electric field generated by the plane is E_{plane}=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}\hat{\mathbf{z}}.
Then, by the definition of potential, I can get the potential V_{plane}=-\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}z
On the other hand, the electric field generated by the wire is E_{wire}=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}r}\hat{\mathbf{r}}
Then, the potential is V_{wire}=-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}}\ln{\frac{r}{a}}=-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}}\ln{\frac{\sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}}{a}}
Thus, the total potential will be V_{total}=-\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}z-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}}\ln{\frac{\sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}}{a}}

Now, we can use the relation \sigma=-\epsilon\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}|_{z=0} to get the surface charge density.
<br /> <br /> \sigma = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi} \frac{a}{\sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}} \frac{1}{2} \frac{2(z-d)}{\sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}} |_{z=0} + \frac{\sigma}{2}\\<br /> \frac{\sigma}{2} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi} \frac{-ad}{d^{2}+y^{2}}\\<br /> \sigma = \frac{-\lambda a d}{\pi(d^{2}+y^{2})}<br /> <br />
Then, we can go back and get the total potential in the system
<br /> V =-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}}\ln{\frac{\sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}}{a}} + \frac{\lambda adz}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}(d^{2}+y^{2})}<br />
and the capacitance per length of the wire is
<br /> C = \frac{\lambda}{V} = \frac{2\pi\epsilon_{0}(d^{2}+y^{2})}{adz} - 2\pi\epsilon_{0}\ln{\frac{a}{\sqrt{(z-d)^{2}+y^{2}}}}<br /> [\tex]
 
Kelly Lin said:
the electric field generated by the plane is
That expression is for a uniformly charged plane. It won't be.
Consider the method of images.
 
haruspex said:
That expression is for a uniformly charged plane. It won't be.
Consider the method of images.
At first glance of the question, I came up with this method.
However, the plane isn't grounded so I am unsure if this method is valid for this problem?
 
Kelly Lin said:
At first glance of the question, I came up with this method.
However, the plane isn't grounded so I am unsure if this method is valid for this problem?
It is an infinite plane. That is effectively grounded.
 
  • Like
Likes Kelly Lin
Oh~ I see~
Thanks a lot!
haruspex said:
It is an infinite plane. That is effectively grounded.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
906
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
796
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K