Capacitance per length unit of coaxial cable

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance per unit length of a coaxial cable with a double-layered dielectric. Given parameters include inner radius (a=2mm), outer radius (b=4mm), and outer dielectric radius (c=8mm), with relative permittivities εr1=3 and εr2=4.5. The calculated capacitance per unit length (C') is derived using Gauss's law and results in a value of 288pF/m, which contradicts the book's solution of 144pF/m. The discrepancy highlights the need for careful consideration of dielectric effects in the electric field calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with capacitance calculations in coaxial cables
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their properties
  • Proficiency in logarithmic functions and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Gauss's law for dielectrics in different geometries
  • Study the derivation of capacitance formulas for coaxial cables
  • Investigate the effects of varying dielectric constants on electric fields
  • Explore common mistakes in calculating capacitance and electric fields in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, physicists studying electrostatics, and professionals working with coaxial cable design and analysis.

gruba
Messages
203
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Coaxial cable has double layered dielectric.
a=2mm, b=4mm, c=8mm, εr1=3, εr2=4.5, Uab=1000V
1. Calculate capacitance per unit length of a cable.
2. Calculate inner and outer charge densities of a cable.
2. Homework Equations

Gauss law
C'=Q'/U
σ = nD
σp = nP

3. The Attempt at a Solution

After applying Gauss law for dielectrics, I get electric field:
E=Q'/(2πε0r1r2r)).
Limits of integration for voltage: (a - b) + (b - c)
U=(Q'(ln(b/a)+ln(c/b)))/(2πε0r1r2))


Then, C'=(2πε0r1r2))/(ln(b/a)+ln(c/b))
This gives me C'=288pF/m but in my books solution it is C'=144pF/m.

Could someone check this.
Thanks for replies.
 

Attachments

  • image.PNG
    image.PNG
    4 KB · Views: 510
Physics news on Phys.org
E shouldn't have the same formula in both parts, it has to include the local ε somehow. Also, in the way you wrote it the units do not match.
I'm surprised that your answer seems to be exactly a factor of 2 off with this, however.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K