Capacitive Current: Calculating Noise Across Capacitors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Apteronotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Noise
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Suppose you have a simple capacitor, where the potential on one side is held constant and the other is allowed to vary randomly.

What is the capacitive current?

thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AC signals pass through capacitors as a function of their wavelength, I don't know the function off the top of my head however...

EDIT: Maybe this equation?

i = C de/dt

'i' is the current
'C' is the capacitance
'de/dt' is the voltage differentiated with respect to time, I don't know any fancy latex
 
James, thank you for your reply.

With my limited understanding of electricity, I presumed that to calculate capacitive currents we had to take the derivative. ie.
[tex] I_C=\frac{dQ}{dt}[/tex]
But since the potential is random (noise) on one side then [tex]Q[/tex] is random as well, and this would lead us to calculate the derivative of a random number.

Any idea?

Thanks
 
James Leighe said:
i = C de/dt

'i' is the current
'C' is the capacitance
'de/dt' is the voltage differentiated with respect to time, I don't know any fancy latex

Yes exactly, but in this case e - (the voltage differential) is random.
... Any clue?

thanks again,
 
I dunno, take the root mean square of the voltage 'noise' and use that as your AC 'input'?

Random in random out, you can only quantify the relationship here... which we have already done I think.
 
True thermal "noise" power across a capacitor may be an oxymoron, because the voltage is in phase-quadrature with the current, and therefore is not real power. Sometimes Johnson-Nyquist thermal noise power (e.g., kTB) formulas for low-bandwidth systems end up with a C in the formula, but this may be just due to a cancellation of R in R/RC.
Bob S