Capacitor loop with no resistance ?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a circuit simulation issue where a circuit with two capacitors in parallel is flagged for having "no resistance." Users clarify that the simulator, which is designed for LRC circuits, requires a resistance to function correctly, as it cannot handle ideal capacitor loops. In reality, all components have some resistance, which the simulator does not account for. To resolve the issue, adding a small resistor (e.g., 0.001 ohms) allows the simulation to run properly. The circuit itself is valid, but the simulator's limitations necessitate the inclusion of resistance for accurate calculations.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
"Capacitor loop with no resistance" ?

In Circuit Simulator at http://falstad.com/circuit/ I created a circuit attached below which refuses to run because "capacitor loop with no resistance". To me it seems that there is no problem with this circuit and that the two capacitors will simply act as an equivalent capacitor of capacitors in parallel. They would charge up and that would be the end of that. What am I missing? The reason I'm posting here is that I assume there is that this is due to my lack of understanding of the physics of the situation rather than some bug.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    687 bytes · Views: 2,087
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org


There's nothing "wrong" with your circuit. Your two 10uF capacitors in parallel are equivalent to a 20uF capacitor.

I guess the problem is that the simulator only works for LRC circuits. It's not a general purpose simulator like SPICE.
 


DocZaius said:
In Circuit Simulator at http://falstad.com/circuit/ I created a circuit attached below which refuses to run because "capacitor loop with no resistance". To me it seems that there is no problem with this circuit and that the two capacitors will simply act as an equivalent capacitor of capacitors in parallel. They would charge up and that would be the end of that. What am I missing? The reason I'm posting here is that I assume there is that this is due to my lack of understanding of the physics of the situation rather than some bug.
This is a limitation of the simulator - it's saying there is a path that current can go, which is from one capacitor to another, and then back to the first, never encountering any resistance. That messes up the calculations. In real life that never happens, because everything has a very small resistance, even wires.

This is resolved by adding a very small resistor to either one of the capacitors - you can make it 0.001 ohms, which is the resistance of half an inch of wire AWG26.
 


AlephZero said:
There's nothing "wrong" with your circuit. Your two 10uF capacitors in parallel are equivalent to a 20uF capacitor.

I guess the problem is that the simulator only works for LRC circuits. It's not a general purpose simulator like SPICE.

It has its limitations, but it is general enough to simulate the internals of the 741:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=43682&stc=1&d=1328754979
 

Attachments

  • a.bmp
    a.bmp
    270.1 KB · Views: 2,552


You are probably violating some conditions of the simulation. For example if one of the capacitors has an initial voltage different from the other then this is not a valid circuit and simulation is not possible unless a resistance is inserted as indicated.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
610
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K