Capacitors - please, need help

  • Thread starter Thread starter joker_900
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a circuit involving a cell, resistors, and a capacitor, where the user seeks help deriving the voltage across the capacitor over time. The user correctly identifies the charging behavior of capacitors in series and parallel configurations but struggles with applying Kirchhoff's laws to the circuit. They express confusion about the current flow and voltage changes across the resistors as the capacitor charges. The expected voltage function across the capacitor is Vc(t)=4.125(1 - exp(-t/0.1375)), but the user is unsure how to arrive at this result. The thread highlights the complexities of analyzing circuits with multiple components and the need for clear application of circuit laws.
joker_900
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Capacitors - please, need urgent help!

Homework Statement


I've attached the circuit diagram but it's basically a cell connected in series with a 10kohm resistor, and then a 20microfarad capacitor and 22kohm resistor connected in parallel.

The capacitor begins charging at t=0. Show that the voltage across the capacitor as a function of time is Vc(t)=4.125(1 - exp(-t/0.1375))


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well i know that in a simple one resistor one capacitor series circuit, the current through the resistor is I=I0e^(-t/RC), and the voltage across the resistor is V=V0e^(-t/RC) (where V0=EMF)


Now i thought this same relationship might apply to the 10kohm (R1) resistor, as initially it's voltage = EMF, and as the capacitor charges, Vc increases and the voltage across R1 therefore decreases. However, in this situation, there is always current flow and so the voltage across R1 does not become zero.

I thought about applying kirchhoffs current law, but this did not seem to get me anywhere.


I am thoroughly confused, PLEASE HELP!

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 418
Physics news on Phys.org
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
920
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K