Capillary action for non-polar substances?

AI Thread Summary
Capillary action is typically associated with polar substances, but observations show non-polar substances like ether can also exhibit this phenomenon, albeit more slowly than water. The discussion highlights that intermolecular forces, including dipole-dipole interactions and London dispersion forces, play a role in capillary action, challenging the notion that only polar substances can participate. The complexity of adhesion and wetting is emphasized, with references to historical and contemporary theories that attempt to explain these processes. Despite extensive literature on the subject, conclusive models remain elusive, particularly for specific cases like long-chain polymers. The ongoing challenges in understanding capillary action and wetting phenomena indicate that the field continues to evolve.
Archosaur
Messages
333
Reaction score
4
I thought I understood capillary action, but according to my understanding, non-polar substances shouldn't undergo capillary action. Today in lab, we were working with ether, which is non-polar, and I noticed it climbed up a paper towel. It was slower than water, but still... what intermolecular forces pulled the ether up the towel?

Or is my understanding of capillary action wrong? Are intermolecular forces necessary? They must be!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Polarity is not a binary property. Diethyl/methyl ether is actually fairly polar. So to begin with: Dipole-dipole interactions. Also, London forces.

If there were no (or little) intermolecular forces, it wouldn't be a liquid.
 
Archosaur said:
I thought I understood capillary action, but according to my understanding, non-polar substances shouldn't undergo capillary action.

Why do/did you think this?
 
Aren't hydrogen bonds / dipole-dipole forces responsible for capillary action?
 
Ah. Actually, we do not yet have a microscopic theory for adhesion, adsorption, or wetting. Girifalco and Good did some seminal work in the late 1950's using the Lewis acid-base formalism, but Lee (in "Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion", VSP 1993) identified two main theoretical formalisms (so-called Surface Tension Component and Equation of State), and identified 6 molecular interactions (electrostatic, charge transfer, exchange-respulsion, polarization, dispersion, coupling) that go into the different models. It's been a long time since I got into detail about this; the field has hopefully advanced in the meantime.

There's a huge amount of literature on this subject; none of it is conclusive and none of it is valid for more than a few very special cases- long chain polymers, for example.

Even worse, the problem of wetting leads to an irreducible singularity at the (moving) contact line). This problem has not been resolved. Shikhmurzaev's "Capillary flows with forming interfaces" is a good summary of the current state of the art regarding this problem.
 
Back
Top