Possible webpage title: Does Increased Inertia Lead to Higher Capillary Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capillary Inertia
Click For Summary
Increased inertia in a fluid is believed to lead to higher capillary numbers, as the capillary number (Ca) is defined as the ratio of viscous to surface tension effects, expressed as Ca = μV/σ. As inertia increases, velocity also increases, suggesting that Ca would rise if all other factors remain constant. The relationship between inertial and viscous effects is captured by the Reynolds number, while the product of inertial and capillary effects is represented by the formula ρV²L/σ. This indicates that higher velocity, driven by increased inertia, correlates with a higher capillary number. Therefore, the discussion concludes that more inertia likely results in a higher capillary number.
member 428835
Hi PF!

The capillary number is defined as ##Ca = \mu V/\sigma##. Does more inertia in a fluid increase the capillary number?

As inertia increases, it's my intuition that so does velocity. Then it seems (all else constant) that ##Ca## increases too. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The capillary number represents the ratio of viscous to surface tension effects. The ratio of inertial to viscous effects is determined by the Reynolds number. So, the product of the two is the ratio of inertial to capillary effects. What does this give you? What are you defining as inertia?
 
/
Chestermiller said:
What does this give you? What are you defining as inertia?
This gives us ##\rho V^2 L / \sigma##, which is the velocity dependence I would expect. I know inertia characteristically scales proportional to ##V^2##. Holding everything constant but letting velocity change implies more inertial yields higher capillary number. Thanks for the help!
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K