Car Acceleration & Friction: Force, Coefficient & Calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of a car's acceleration and the required force of friction to maintain that acceleration while traveling around a circular road. The car has a mass of 1300 kg, takes 35 seconds to complete the circular path with a radius of 40 m, resulting in an acceleration of 1.289 m/s² and a frictional force of 1675.819 N. The discrepancy between the user's calculations and the site's answers indicates that the site likely used incorrect formulas, particularly for acceleration. The user concludes that the coefficient of friction calculated as 0.132 is consistent with their results, further supporting the assertion that the site's answers are incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of friction and its coefficient
  • Ability to manipulate and apply algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration formulas
  • Learn about the relationship between frictional force and normal force
  • Explore common mistakes in physics calculations related to circular motion
  • Investigate the impact of varying coefficients of friction on vehicle dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the principles of circular motion and friction in automotive contexts.

intdx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/index.html
4. A 1300 kg car takes 35 s to travel around a circular road that has a radius of 40 m.
...
b. What is the acceleration of the car?
c. How big should the force of friction be to maintain this acceleration?
d. How big should the coefficient of the force of friction be?
m=1300kg
t=35s
r=40m

Homework Equations


V=\frac{2\pi r}{t}
a_c=\frac{V^2}{r}
F_c=ma_c
F_f=\mu mg
F_f=F_c
\mu=\frac{a_c}{g}=\frac{F_c}{mg}

The Attempt at a Solution


Plugging into the formulae is pretty elementary, so I'll spare you all that. I used the first two equations for part b, then the third for part c. Anyway, I get 1.289m/s2 for part b and 1675.819N for part c, but the site's answers are 1.47m/s2 and 2210N, respectively. It appears that, to have arrived at their answer for part b, they used the incorrect equation a_c=V^2/t. I'm not sure how they arrived at the answer for part c.

Using either part of the last equation above (with my answers for part b or part c) gives me μ=0.132. The site's answer for part d is 0.15, but--using the same equation that I have listed above--this is consistent with its answer for part b, but not with its answer for part c.

Would someone please explain what's going on here? :confused:

Thanks!

P.S. You know, I feel as if, from typing this, I've pretty much assured myself that the site is wrong. (I have another fairly recent post in which I consider the same thing, and the couple of replies it's gotten seem to support the idea.) I hope that doesn't sound arrogant, but it bothers me that the site was written by high school students.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I agree with the numbers you got. I think that the site is wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
680
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K