Carbon-14 Half-Life: Calculating Decays After 50,000 Years

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the decay rate of carbon-14 after 50,000 years, starting with an initial decay rate of 16,000 decays per minute and a half-life of 5,730 years. The decay constant (λ) was calculated as 1.2 x 10^-4 using the formula T = ln(2)/λ. The final decay rate after 50,000 years is approximately 40 decays per minute, illustrating that while the decay probability remains constant, the number of carbon-14 nuclei decreases over time, affecting the overall decay rate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with the decay constant (λ) and its calculation
  • Knowledge of differential equations related to decay processes
  • Ability to manipulate exponential functions in mathematical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the decay constant (λ) in radioactive decay
  • Learn about differential equations and their role in modeling decay processes
  • Explore the concept of half-life in various radioactive materials beyond carbon-14
  • Investigate the implications of radioactive decay in carbon dating techniques
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students in physics or chemistry, educators teaching radioactive decay, and researchers involved in carbon dating and radiometric analysis.

Wing2015
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sample containing carbon-14 has 16000 decays per minute. If the half life of carbon-14 is 5730 years. Aproximately how many decays per minute would be occurring after another 50 000 years.

Answer: approximately 40 decays per minute.

Homework Equations



N= No x e^-λt
T=in2/λ
A= λN ( A is the decay rate of sample I.e number of decays per second)

The Attempt at a Solution

Calculated the value of λ first from in2/5730 and got 1.2 x 10^-4.

Then tried to plug it into A= λN and tried to get the value of N by substituting the first activity of 16000.

From here I am stuck because I realized even if I find N and plug it back into the formula I'll be getting the same result. Which makes me confused about the whole question because I would have thought that the decay rate would be constant for a particular sample.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Examining your given data, you are given a time rate of change, a half-life, and you want another time rate of change after a finite amount of time.

It looks like your first plan of action should be to find the initial amount of carbon-14 present, since that is a rather integral part of your equation. I'm not sure what mathematics you have covered, but the derivative of your function N(t) with respect to t will give you an expression for the rate of change at any time t (that's what your third equation looks to be, but with time set to 0).

Hope that helps!
 
Hello Wing, and a belated welcome to PF :smile:

"decay rate would be constant for a particular sample" may need some more explanation: what is constant is the probability that one single carbon-14 nucleus decays in a given time. The greater that probability, the more active a sample of a radioactive material. But the activity of a sample also depends on the number of carbon-14 nuclei in the sample, and that number decreases by 1 with every decay. So we write a differential equation for the decay rate (the number of decays per unit time) $${dN\over dt} = -\lambda N$$with the solution you indicate:$$N(t) = N_0 e^{-\lambda t}$$This can also be written as ##N(t) = N_0 e^{- t/\tau}## with ##\tau = 1/\lambda##, or as $$N(t) = N_0 \;2^{- t/\tau_{\scriptscriptstyle 1\over 2}}$$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K