Carbon bonding in graphite

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the bonding characteristics of carbon in graphite, focusing on the bond order and the role of p_z orbitals. Participants explore theoretical models, resonance structures, and calculations related to bond energies and orders, with references to established literature.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the bond order is represented as ##\sigma + \frac{\pi}{2}## instead of ##\sigma + \frac{\pi}{3}##, suggesting a misunderstanding of the bonding structure in graphite.
  • Another participant compares graphite to benzene, noting the number of pi electrons and C-C bonds, and discusses the resonance structures that can be drawn for both compounds.
  • Some participants highlight the complexity of the bonding situation, mentioning that p_z orbitals interact with neighboring bonds and suggesting that simplified representations may not capture the full picture.
  • A participant references Coulson's work using Hückel theory, which provides a calculated pi bond order of 0.53, leading to a total bond order of 1.53 between carbon atoms.
  • Another participant critiques the article by Wheland cited by Coulson for lacking derivations of binding energy and shares their own calculations based on Hückel or tight binding models, detailing the mathematical approach and results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the representation of bond order and the implications of resonance structures. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the bonding in graphite, and multiple competing models and calculations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the nature of bonding and resonance that may not be universally accepted. The mathematical derivations presented are complex and may depend on specific interpretations of the models used.

laser1
Messages
170
Reaction score
23
Homework Statement
Describe the C-C bonding in graphite
Relevant Equations
N/A
My lecture notes says it is ##\sigma + \frac{\pi}{2}##. Why is it not ##\sigma + \frac{\pi}{3}##? As each electron from every carbon is shared between 3 C-C bonds
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you. Benzene has 6 pi electrons and 6 C-C bonds. Graphite has 6 pi electrons and 9 C-C bonds per 6 C atoms. You can draw 3 resonance structures; each bond is double in 1 structure and single in 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: laser1
mjc123 said:
I agree with you. Benzene has 6 pi electrons and 6 C-C bonds. Graphite has 6 pi electrons and 9 C-C bonds per 6 C atoms. You can draw 3 resonance structures; each bond is double in 1 structure and single in 2.
Yeah that was my reasoning too. Probably just a typo. Thanks for confirming!
 
This is a difficult question! The p_z orbitals do not only have bonding interactions with neighbouring atoms but also interact with the neighbouring bonds. If one assumes a perfect pairing quinoid structure, the pi system would be non-bonding.
 
DrDu said:
This is a difficult question! The p_z orbitals do not only have bonding interactions with neighbouring atoms but also interact with the neighbouring bonds. If one assumes a perfect pairing quinoid structure, the pi system would be non-bonding.
Oh. I assume that my notation sigma + pi/2 etc. stuff is just a very simplified representation of it?
 
During the holidays, I did some reading and was finally pointed to Coulson's book "Valence":
Using Hückel theory, he finds a pi bond order of 0.53, hence a total bond order of 1.53 between any two C-atoms. More details are available in the following article:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1939.0006
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and laser1
As the article by Wheland (1940), cited by Coulson, does not contain any derivation of the binding energy of graphite, just stating the resonance energy of 0.58 per atom, I tried to calculate this value myself.
There are numerous texts available, where the Hückel or tight binding model is solved for graphene.
The elementary cell of graphene contains two C atoms, so the Hückel matrix for a given point in reciprocal space is 2x2 with zeros on the diagonal and ## -\beta (1+\exp(i\phi_1)+\exp(i\phi_2))## in the 12 position (and the complex conjugated value in position 21). Here ## \phi_{1,2}## are proportional to the elements of the k vector. This element can be interpreted as the sum of the matrix elements between atom 1 and 2 in the same cell, and between atom 1 in the cell considered and 2 in adjacent cells. The precise relation between ##\phi## and k is not important, as the band is full and we will have to average ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2## over the range 0 to ##2\pi##.
The orbital energies are
$$-\beta | 1+\exp(i\phi_1)+\exp(i\phi_2)| =-\beta (3+2\cos(\phi_1)+2\cos(\phi_2)+2\cos(\phi_1-\phi_2))$$.
Wolfram Alpha returns a value of 62.1626 for the double integral over ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2## from 0 to ##2\pi## respectively. I don't think this integral has an analytic solution. Division by ##(2\pi)^2## yields finally ##-\beta \times 1.57460##. This has to be multiplied by two as there are two electrons in each cell, but also divided by two to get the value per atom. This practically coincides with the value of 1.58 ##\beta## reported by Coulson.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and WWGD

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K