Carl Brannen's Triumph in Hawaii: Japanese Physicist Koide Cites 2 Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local News
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
Carl Brannen is having a real triumph in Hawaii

He and the famous Japanese physicist Koide are giving talks back to back today and their slides are on line. It seems like on about half his slides (many many anyway) Koide is referring to two equations of Brannen's which Koide has named "the Brannen first relation" and "the Brannen second relation".

The discussion is in Particle Physics subforum, but since Carl B often posts here in Beyond it seems appropriate to notice this bit of news. Read Kea and arivero's discussion with Carl here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=140402
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Our "campaign for Koide awareness" is important because it runs against one of the more fundamental prejudices of current theory: that as masses are got down from the GUT scale, no relationship can be seen in the infrared, low energy, limit.
 
More news (and congratulations where appropriate) about doings of people who sometimes post in the Beyond forum.

Christine has completed the first year of blogging---pretty nice blog too.

Bee Hossenfelder is obviously having a great time at Perimeter.
Her furniture finally arrived from Santa Barbara (congratulations:smile: ).

Bee just posted a paper on arxiv
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1143150#post1143150
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611017
Phenomenological Quantum Gravity
which will be published in the SUSY 06 proceedings.

F-H just posted a paper written with several others including Carlo Rovelli.
He finished the program he was in at Marseille and is now working on PhD at Nottingham---where John Barrett is.

Anybody think of more news?
 
Last edited:
marcus said:
He and the famous Japanese physicist Koide are giving talks back to back today and their slides are on line.

Marcus

Where are the Koide slides?
 
The Koide presentation:
http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/indico/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=54&sessionId=116&confId=3

The speaker before us, Paul Harrison of Warwick, was very closely associated with our stuff, of course from a different point of view, "tribimaximal mixing angles". His talk was fascinating (despite my feeling of impending doom while listening to it).
http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/indico/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=37&sessionId=116&confId=3

He was using matrices a lot like the ones that show up in my slides, particularly what he calls the "democratic operator", I call the "democratic primitive idempotent" in my book on the density operator theory:
http://www.brannenworks.com/dmaa.pdf

I feel that we could have sat around talking about neutrinos and finished each others sentences.

I also attended the talk on whether or not string theory can predict anything and will blog it when I get the chance. I hate to type through someone's hard won talk, even if it is dead wrong, obvious and or boring.

Speaking of which, here's my abstract:
http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/indico/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=114&sessionId=116&confId=3

When I typed in the above abstract, I was so breathless about the possibility of meeting Koide that I quite forgot to mention anything about density operator theory. And partly I was afraid they'd put me into "beyond the standard model" sections which are too far divorced from experiment for me to really fit.

Carl
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top