Carleton University EngPhys ugrad to grad school at Berkeley

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prospects of an undergraduate student from Carleton University in Engineering Physics applying to graduate schools in the United States, particularly focusing on programs in semiconductor physics and related fields. Participants explore the implications of the university's reputation, the importance of academic performance, research experience, and standardized testing in the application process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that attending a well-known university can enhance the credibility of an applicant, particularly through strong recommendation letters.
  • Others argue that excelling in standardized tests is crucial for international applicants and can help in comparing oneself to peers from more prestigious institutions.
  • One participant asserts that Carleton University is a top school in Canada for engineering physics, citing its contributions to significant projects like the LHC.
  • There is a consensus that strong grades, extensive research experience, and good reference letters are essential for a competitive application to top US graduate schools.
  • The original poster mentions having an A average and research experience in nanoelectronics but lacks publications, prompting questions about the nature of their research experience.
  • Suggestions for additional schools to consider include the University of Florida and the University of Wisconsin, alongside the original list of prestigious institutions.
  • One participant encourages the original poster to engage more with professors and undertake projects to strengthen their application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of strong academic credentials and research experience for graduate school applications. However, there is no consensus on the extent to which the reputation of Carleton University may impact the applicant's chances, with differing views on its standing relative to top US institutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the significance of university reputation, the necessity of publications, and the role of standardized testing, indicating a range of assumptions and perspectives on what constitutes a strong application.

Who May Find This Useful

Undergraduate students considering graduate school applications in physics or engineering, particularly those from institutions with less recognition in the US, may find this discussion relevant.

BatBanaGirl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm an undergrad at Carleton University (Canada) in EngPhys. I just finished my third year. My interest is in semiconductor physics. I have a A average grade, and two years research experience.
I was wondering, is aiming for MSE at Berkeley or UIllinois or Michigan too high for me? What about McGil, UofT? Any other recommendations (is MIT, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon even reaches??)
Is coming from a university that's not one of the top ranked, famous ones going to be a drawback for US grad schools

If anyone has graduated from Carleton Uni and gone on to top US grad schools in Applied Phys, EngPhys or MatSci, or if you know anyone who has, their stats/experience would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It helps if your school is famous, for obvious reasons - lots of competition means that when someone sees the letters recommending you, they're going to feel much safer accepting someone with top letters comparing them to top students at top schools.

I would say one thing you can do is excel at the standardized testing required for admission. International applicants are usually expected to anyway, and being very strong there can help you compare to the others (even though, in the scope of things, your research experience, maturity of academic understanding, and overall performance in school are more important).

I am unfamiliar with Carleton, though.

Those schools are all very good ones, but I think if you're one of the best students period that your school has seen as of late, you still have a chance. Stanford, MIT, Berkeley, etc are very hard to get into even for top US applicants, as a reference, so you're going to have to stand out against them. You should still try, but apply widely to places you feel can meet your needs (as is customary advice for PhD applicants).
 
Carleton IS a top school in Canada (even North America?) for engineering physics. Especially since one of the detectors at the LHC was designed and built at Carleton.

The best thing you can do to strengthen your chances at getting into a top US grad school is get amazing grades, lots of research experience, maybe a few papers, and some outstanding reference letters from profs you have worked for.

If you don't have any of the above then you're going to have a really hard time getting accepted to a top grad school.

What sort of research experience do you have? How are your grades?
 
I have a A average grade, with a mix of A+, A and A-'s. I've been pretty involved in research of nanoelectronics so far. No publications or anything, though.
I'm also thinking of UofFlorida, Uof Wisconsin.
What else do you think would be good grad schools to apply to?

PS: Carleton's good for particle phys and medical phys, and sadly not one of the top for solid state phys :|
 
^ I think you're doing very well and should have a shot then! Be sure that professors at your university are aware how excited and able you are. Try doing some mini project with them, even if it's just understanding some topic and writing a short report about it. That will take you a long way when you apply to graduate programs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K