Carnot Engine question- quick check

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a Carnot heat engine, specifically focusing on the calculation of work performed by the engine based on heat transfer and efficiency. The original poster attempts to determine the work done by the engine after calculating the heat rejected during the melting of ice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between heat transfer (Qc) and work (W) in the context of the Carnot engine's efficiency. Questions arise about the correct application of efficiency in calculating work and the rearrangement of equations to find Qh.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the definitions and relationships between Qh, Qc, and efficiency. There is an ongoing exploration of algebraic manipulation to solve for unknowns, with various interpretations of the equations being discussed. The conversation reflects a mix of attempts to clarify concepts and share algebraic techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence in their algebra skills, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge that affects their problem-solving approach. The original poster is preparing to submit their answer for a homework assignment, which adds a layer of urgency to the discussion.

vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
A Carnot heat engine uses a hot reservoir consisting of a large amount of boiling water and a cold reservoir consisting of a large tub of ice and water.
In 5 minutes of operation of the engine, the heat rejected by the engine melts a mass of ice equal to 2.85×10−2 Kg.

Throughout this problem use Lf=3.34*10^5 j/kg for the heat of fusion for water.

- During this time, how much work is performed by the engine?


my attempt:
i noticed that the two temperature differences are 100 degrees and 0 degrees(mixture of icenwater)
so the maximum efficiency is n = 1- qc/qh = 0.27

how much work is performed by the engine,
Q(work)=Mass melted * latent heat fusion thing
Qc= m*Lf
so (2.85*10^-2 ) * (3.34*10^5) = 9519 Joules

now this is where my question comes in,
do i multiply the efficiency, 0.27 by 9519
to get the work performed by the engine
or is that the work lost by the engine so 9519-.27*9519

i just wanted to check before i submit the awnser(it's mastering physics)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vorcil said:

now this is where my question comes in,
do i multiply the efficiency, 0.27 by 9519
to get the work performed by the engine
or is that the work lost by the engine so 9519-.27*9519

i just wanted to check before i submit the awnser(it's mastering physics)
Go back to the definition of efficiency: W/Qh. In any engine, W = Qh-Qc.

\eta = 1 - \frac{Q_c}{Q_h}

You have Qc. What you want to find first is Qh.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Go back to the definition of efficiency: W/Qh. In any engine, W = Qh-Qc.

\eta = 1 - \frac{Q_c}{Q_h}

You have Qc. What you want to find first is Qh.

AM

so Qh = (1 - Qc) / n ?
 
vorcil said:
so Qh = (1 - Qc) / n ?

Your algebra is bad.

Qh = (Qh - Qc) / n
 
djeitnstine said:
Your algebra is bad.

Qh = (Qh - Qc) / n

I'm sorry, i had to teach myself everything until i got to university,
can you please explain how you solved for Qh, from n = 1-(qc/qh)
so that i might not make that mistake again?

and from this,
Qh = (Qh - Qc) / n
aren't i supposed to know qh to solve for qh? or is that equation the same as n=1-(qh/qc)
 
Last edited:
I used the solver in my calculator to find Qh from n = 1 - (qc/qh)
and it was 13039J
w = qh-qc,
13039 - 9519 = 3507 J which was correct
but would still like to know how to rearrange, n = 1 - (qc/qh) to solve for qh =]
thanks everyone
 
Your best friend is some pen and paper man...

Flip some numbers around and do some mathematical acrobatics to achieve Q_h = \frac{Q_c}{1-\eta}
 
vorcil said:
I used the solver in my calculator to find Qh from n = 1 - (qc/qh)
and it was 13039J
w = qh-qc,
13039 - 9519 = 3507 J which was correct
but would still like to know how to rearrange, n = 1 - (qc/qh) to solve for qh =]
thanks everyone
Vorcil. You need to study algebra before you can hope to do anything here. Get a tutor - fast. It is not difficult but you need this basic skill. When you have an equation, you can rearrange it by doing the same thing to each side:

\eta = 1 - \frac{Q_c}{Q_h}

subtract 1 from both sides and multiply both sides by -1:

\frac{Q_c}{Q_h} = \eta - 1

Multiply both sides by Qh and divide by \eta - 1

\frac{Q_c}{\eta -1} = Q_h

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Vorcil. You need to study algebra before you can hope to do anything here. Get a tutor - fast. It is not difficult but you need this basic skill. When you have an equation, you can rearrange it by doing the same thing to each side:

\eta = 1 - \frac{Q_c}{Q_h}

subtract 1 from both sides and multiply both sides by -1:

\frac{Q_c}{Q_h} = \eta - 1

Multiply both sides by Qh and divide by \eta - 1

\frac{Q_c}{\eta -1} = Q_h


AM

thanks for showing me, had no idea that you could solve it like that,

as for studying calculus and algebra, i have reasonable skills, I'm doing first year math and physics papers and don't find anything hard except for the occasional weird algebraic things that come up, I've mastered a majority of the basic algebraic skills needed to solve problems in physics but there are some rules that I've never seen before,

for the example above, i knew you could subtract 1 from both sides, but didn't know you could use the Qh, multiply both sides by it to move it from one side of the equation to the other. after finals, i'll go on youtube, and watch all the special algebra movies on Mathtv, the guy explains most of the rules i missed out on learning

cheers AM and that other fella
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K