So I wonder why the gradient in coordniates other than cartesian ones bears coefficients. Let's take spherical coordinates for example. We have(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

(Source) - Sorry if image doesn't work - too lazy to get the TeX right.

From what I know, I don't see anything that raises cartesian coordinates above any other C/S' (apart from marginal properties such as whether the mapping is reversable). I hence would expect the gradient in spherical coordinates to be

[tex]\vec\nabla = \vec{e}_r\frac{d}{dr} + \vec{e}_\phi\frac{d}{d\phi} + \vec{e}_\theta\frac{d}{d\theta}[/tex],

where [tex]\vec{e}_\dots[/tex] is the unit vector in [tex]\vec{g}_{\dots} = \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial \dots}[/tex] direction (where |g| is not normalized).

After all, the gradient in coordinate q descibes the change of intensity I in q direction. And when I change [tex]\vec{r}[/tex] by a little [tex]d\theta[/tex], the change in intensity is naturally [tex]\frac{dI}{d\phi}[/tex] andnot[tex]\frac{1}{r\sin(\phi)}\frac{\partial I}{\partial \theta}[/tex] (why would it be partial anyway?).

So why is transformed from cartesian coordinates? What validates cartesian coordinates as the origin of all transforms, so to say? I could understand the application of the Leibniz'en chain rule if [tex]\nabla[/tex] to a scalar potential in general coordinates were sought with respects to cartesian coordinates. But we are looking for the gradient in terms of spherical coordinates - so what do cartesian coordinates want to tamper with?

best regards

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cartesian coordinates vs. The rest of the world?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Cartesian coordinates rest | Date |
---|---|

I Coordinate systems vs. Euclidean space | Dec 4, 2017 |

A Simple metric tensor question | Aug 14, 2017 |

A Ellipse of transformation from spherical to cartesian | Apr 23, 2016 |

Cartesian torque to Spherical Coordinates | Apr 1, 2011 |

The volume of a spherical cap by integrating and using Cartesian coordinates | Jul 13, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**