Cassini's Grand Finale - Fascinating New Insight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stavros Kiri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    probe saturn
Click For Summary
Cassini's Grand Finale involved a series of 22 dives between Saturn and its rings, culminating in a planned plunge into Saturn's atmosphere on September 15, 2017. The spacecraft successfully completed its first dive on April 26, 2017, transmitting data back to Earth after navigating the gap between Saturn and its rings. NASA's project manager expressed satisfaction with the mission's execution, noting that no spacecraft had ever approached Saturn so closely. The final plunge was designed to gather atmospheric data, although the transmission of images was limited due to bandwidth constraints. Cassini's mission concluded with its destruction in Saturn's atmosphere, leaving behind traces of plutonium that may intrigue future civilizations.
  • #31
Is there a link for the final video from the craft during the plunge? Sorry if I've missed an obvious link.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
berkeman said:
Is there a link for the final video from the craft during the plunge? Sorry if I've missed an obvious link.
I believe all data was dedicated to science observations, there wasn't enough bandwidth to live stream the reentry and the last images were transmitted on the 14th. ((would have been a hell of a show to watch though):woot:
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #33
Ah, thanks. Makes sense. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #34
Cassini may have become one with a gas giant but here is a trailer of sorts for possible upcoming attractions (Ice Giants are going to be in the spotlight after Juno, with the exception of certain well known moons and a rocky planet or two). Let's see now... launch approximately 2030, 13 year cruise... I doubt I'll be in the audience for that show. :wink:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/icegiants/mission_study/Full-Report.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #35
Here is some of the best I found so far:
1. End of mission:

2. Last look at Saturn:

3. See Where the Cassini Spacecraft Crashed into Saturn (Photos)
(https://www.space.com/38170-cassini- spacecraft -saturn-crash-site-photos.html)
4. In Photos: Cassini Mission Ends with Epic Dive into Saturn
(https://www.space.com/38168-cassini-grand-finale-saturn-final-photos.html?utm_source=notification)

Also regarding
berkeman said:
Is there a link for the final video from the craft during the plunge? Sorry if I've missed an obvious link.
I agree with @1oldman2 . See/read e.g. #3. :

"...
...
The last photos NASA's Cassini spacecraft ever took were of its own grave.
...
...
Cassini burned up like a meteor in Saturn's atmosphere early this morning (Sept. 15), ending its historic 13-year study of the ringed-planet system with a dramatic final plunge.

And you can see exactly where Cassini went in, thanks to a series of images the probe took during its approach to the gas giant yesterday afternoon (Sept. 14). [In Photos: Cassini's Last Views of Saturn at Mission's End]

cGFjZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzA3MC8wMzIvaTAyL2Nhc3NpbmktaW1wYWN0LXNpdGUtaXIuanBnPzE1MDU0OTQwMDE=.jpg

...
...
Why are there no images from today, during the plunge itself? The mission team prioritized other information, such as measurements of Saturn's atmospheric composition. And the data-transmission rate to Earth was low — so low that images would have hogged too much bandwidth, mission team members said."
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and Drakkith
  • #36
Saturn now has some Plutonium, in it's atmosphere.
That sure will be interesting to alien astronomers.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and Stavros Kiri
  • #37
rootone said:
Saturn now has some Plutonium, in it's atmosphere.
That sure will be interesting to alien astronomers.
Or to possible future inteligent lifeforms (from the moons). If they solve the mystery they will attribute it to an "ancient alien probe" ...
 
  • #38
Any Pu compounds are not likely to stay in the upper atmosphere for long. They are too heavy.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #39
nikkkom said:
Any Pu compounds are not likely to stay in the upper atmosphere for long. They are too heavy.
Good point. Also I was kind of joking in the post above that, but: (Question to everyone)

Is it possible that this whole Cassini business (story) has left some trace in the planet, for its pass, possible to be discovered and "decoded" later by some future civilization?

[Plutonium traces is one case, as it didn't naturaly fit in the planet before - it doesn't match the rest of the expected planet's composition ... . But is that the only trace?]

Another question: why didn't they keep Cassini in natural orbit around Saturn? [Kind of like an allegedly "black knight satelite" ... to be seen or even used in the future ... (even NASA, ESA etc. could perhaps still make some use of it in the future! ...)]

Can it be that the "bacteria contamination (to the moons Titan and Enceladus)" is just an excuse?
 
Last edited:
  • #40
Had Cassini exploded on takeoff from the failing rocket engine, wouldn't it have spread the Plutonium to the Earth atmosphere? What is the effect of this? How much radiation can each person receive. Maybe it shouldn't have taken off as it can give precedence for other probes to go up too.
 
  • #41
fanieh said:
Had Cassini exploded on takeoff from the failing rocket engine, wouldn't it have spread the Plutonium to the Earth atmosphere?

Possibly, but the RTG's are fairly robust if I remember correctly. They may have had a good chance of surviving relatively intact.

fanieh said:
What is the effect of this? How much radiation can each person receive.

The answer is complicated, as it involves many different factors, such as the type of radiation, area the radiation is received at, whether the exposure to the radioactive element is external or internal, and many others. The plutonium in the RTG's is in the form of Plutonium Dioxide, which poses far less danger than many other radioactive isotopes, as it emits alpha particles (which can't even penetrate your skin) and is insoluble in water, being excreted from the body fairly rapidly (minimizing the risk of alpha particle radiation if ingested). Inhalation of particulates is slightly more dangerous I believe.

While I don't know the danger of an explosion on takeoff, NASA did a risk analysis on what would happen if the spacecraft malfunctioned and impacted Earth during its flyby:

The terrestrial flyby was the final instance when the probe posed any conceivable danger to human beings. The maneuver was successful, with Cassini passing by 1,171 km (728 mi) above the Earth on August 18, 1999.[47] Had there been any malfunction causing the probe to collide with the Earth, NASA's complete environmental impact study estimated that, in the worst case (with an acute angle of entry in which Cassini would gradually burn up), a significant fraction of the 33 kg[34] of plutonium-238 inside the RTGs would have been dispersed into the Earth's atmosphere so that up to five billion people (i.e. almost the entire terrestrial population) could have been exposed, causing up to an estimated 5,000 additional cancer deaths over the subsequent decades[48] (0.0005 per cent, i.e. a fraction 0.000005, of a billion cancer deaths expected anyway from other causes; the product is incorrectly calculated elsewhere[49] as 500,000 deaths). However, the chance of this happening were estimated to be less than one in one million.

So we expect there to be about 1 billion cancer deaths from all other causes within the next several decades and the worst case projection is an additional 5,000 deaths spread out over this time period (around an extra 100-250 per year). An explosion on takeoff would almost certainly pose far less risk, as the plutonium cannot spread as far and launches always occur over the ocean, not land, minimizing the risk of direct exposure to the population. That also assumes that the RTG's are completely destroyed in the incident, which may not happen.

fanieh said:
Maybe it shouldn't have taken off as it can give precedence for other probes to go up too.

Good. RTG's are excellent power sources for space probes that venture to the outer solar system.
 
  • Like
Likes fanieh, 1oldman2 and Stavros Kiri
  • #43
anyway RIP Cassini!
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #44
Here is an article about other manmade probes which have landed (or crash landed) on other planets. I did not realize how many there were. Not all are from the United States. In fact, the first one to touch Mars was from Russia (with Love... Ha!)
http://vis.sciencemag.org/space-graveyard/
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #45
My only memory of Cassini was when my friends were signing petition to avoid its launch sometime in 1997. I could recall the fear in everyone. Anyway. I got this video PBS Nova Cassini Death Drive to Saturn https://www.space.com/38150-new-film-nova-death-dive-to-saturn.html It may be a good intro to Cassini for those ignorants like me who didn't know the experiences it underwent the past 20 years... see also http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/?utm_source=promourl&utm_medium=direct&utm_campaign=nova_2017

I'll watch the video after finishing watching some TV series I got... anyway... when will Cassini II (or similar) mission be launched.. would it dig into Europa ocean and catch some whale in action?
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #46
fanieh said:
My only memory of Cassini was when my friends were signing petition to avoid its launch sometime in 1997. I could recall the fear in everyone.

Fear of what?
 
  • #47
Drakkith said:
Fear of what?
I assume he means explosion upon take off (cf. his first post earlier ...)
 
  • #48
Drakkith said:
Fear of what?

fear of Cassini failure in the atmosphere contaminating Earth with all its nuclear payload batteries...

anyway. if an ICBM was hit by an THAAD kinetic missile in the upper atmosphere. what would produce more radiation.. the disintegrating ICBM or the exploding Cassini in the upper atmosphere?
 
  • #49
fanieh said:
fear of Cassini failure in the atmosphere contaminating Earth with all its nuclear payload batteries.
The amount of plutonium is only a kg or so.
Had there been a launch accident it would very likely have come down in one piece.
So not widespread contamination, certainly no nuclear explosion, and I am sure there would have been an emergency fast cleanup plan.
 
Last edited:
  • #50
fanieh said:
anyway. if an ICBM was hit by an THAAD kinetic missile in the upper atmosphere. what would produce more radiation.. the disintegrating ICBM or the exploding Cassini in the upper atmosphere?

That's a bit off topic.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K