Cauchy-riemann using polar co-ordinates

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter randybryan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the harmonicity of a function U(x,y) and the determination of its corresponding function V(x,y) using the Cauchy-Riemann equations. The participants explore the use of polar coordinates for differentiation and the implications of harmonic functions in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the function U(x,y) and suggests checking its harmonicity by verifying if d²U/dx² + d²U/dy² = 0, proposing the use of polar coordinates for simplification.
  • Another participant introduces the logarithm of the function as a potential approach, providing a transformation involving partial derivatives.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the next steps after the logarithmic transformation, indicating a lack of clarity on how to proceed.
  • One participant calculates the second derivatives and concludes that u_{xx} + u_{yy} does not equal zero, suggesting that U may not be harmonic.
  • Another participant asserts that for a function to be harmonic, its Laplacian must be zero and claims to have verified this, implying that U is indeed harmonic, and suggests using the Cauchy-Riemann conditions to find V.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the harmonicity of the function U(x,y). While one participant claims to have shown it is harmonic, others challenge this conclusion based on their calculations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the status of U as harmonic and the subsequent determination of V.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence in their calculations, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the differentiation process. The discussion reflects different approaches to the problem, with some participants relying on transformations and others on direct calculations.

randybryan
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I've been given a function U(x,y) where f(z) = U(x,y) + iV(x,y)

and asked to check if it is harmonic and then work out what V(x,y) is

U(x,y) = \frac{y}{(1 - x)^{2} + y^{2}}

To check if it is harmonic I can see if d2U/dx2 + d2U/dy2 = 0

I've tried differentiating and it's fairly arduous, so I'm thinking it might be easier to use polar co-ordinates (As a lot of the other questions simplify when doing this). Can anyone think of a suitable substitution to make the differentiation easier?

the answer in the back of the book says that f(z) = -i / (1 - z)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you consider the logarithm of the function.
log u = log y + log((1-x)2+y2)

\frac{1}{u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=\frac{1}{y}+\frac{2y}{(1-x)^2+y^2}

\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=\frac{1}{(1-x)^2+y^2}+2u^2
 
Thanks, but I still don't know where to go from here
 
So its not helping after all.
I give a try for the second derivatives and obtain

u_{yy}=\frac{2u^2}{y}+8u^3 and u_{xx}=\frac{-2u^2}{y}+\frac{8(1-x)^2u^3}{y^2}

so that
u_{xx}+u_{yy}=\frac{8u^2}{y}\neq 0 ?
 
TRY this
for a function to be harmonic its laplacian should be zero
so \nabla2U = 0

( i worked it out and it is true)

THEN use the Cauchy Rienman conditions to determine v

Finally the f(z)=U+iV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K