Cauchy sequnce and convergence of a non-monotonic sequence.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the convergence of non-monotonic sequences in relation to the Cauchy criterion. It highlights that while the condition |a_n - a_m| < ε for all n, m indicates convergence, the condition (a_{n+1} - a_n) → 0 is not sufficient for convergence. The example of the sequence a_n = √n illustrates that even though the difference between consecutive terms approaches zero, the sum of these differences can grow indefinitely, violating the Cauchy criterion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy sequences and the Cauchy criterion
  • Familiarity with limits and convergence in real analysis
  • Knowledge of non-monotonic sequences
  • Basic calculus, including integration and summation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cauchy sequences in detail
  • Learn about monotonic and non-monotonic sequences in real analysis
  • Explore examples of sequences that satisfy the Cauchy criterion but do not converge
  • Investigate the relationship between convergence and the behavior of differences in sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators and anyone interested in the nuances of sequence convergence and the Cauchy criterion.

kapitan90
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello,
I have a question concerning convergence of the non-monotonic sequences which takes place when the Cauchy criterion is satisfied.
I understand that |a_n - a_m| &lt;ε for all n,mN\ni

Homework Equations


What I don't see is how (a_{n+1} - a_n) →0is not equivalent/enough. Doesn't the fact that the difference tends to zero mean that it can eventually be smaller than any ε?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the examples when this doesn't work, like (\sqrt{n}) but I don't understand the difference between these two criteria.

Could anyone explain why they aren't equivalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So let's take the example of an=√n. For large n, you have then a_{n+1}-a_n \sim n^{-1/2} \rightarrow 0 when n→∞. We can write the Cauchy criterion as (let p = n-m)
\epsilon &gt; a_{m+p}-a_m = \sum_{n=m}^{m+p} a_{n+1}-a_n
So now when n is very large, we have
\epsilon &gt; \sum_{n=m}^{m+p} a_{n+1}-a_n \sim \sum_{n=m}^p n^{-1/2} \sim \int_m^{m+p} dn n^{-1/2} = (\sqrt{m+p}-\sqrt{m})/2
and this grows without limit if you let p to grow, so it can't be smaller than ε for all p.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K