Cauchy's Integral Theorem Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ColdFusion85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around evaluating integrals of functions over specified paths, particularly in the context of Cauchy's Integral Theorem. The function f(z) = z^2 + Im(z) is analyzed over a square path, raising questions about the applicability of Cauchy's theorem due to the non-differentiability of Im(z) in the complex sense. The participant seeks clarification on how to parametrize the path and whether Cauchy's theorem applies, noting that if it does not, integration must be performed along the square's segments. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding complex differentiability and how to handle the integration of functions with real and imaginary components. Ultimately, the participant is looking for guidance on correctly setting up the integral for evaluation.
ColdFusion85
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In each of the following problems, evaluate the integral of the function over the given path. All paths are positively oriented (counterclockwise). In some cases Cauchy's theorem applies, and in some it does not.

Homework Equations



Cauchy's Theorem

Let f be differentiable on a simply connected domain G. Let \Gamma be a closed path in G. Then

\int_{\Gamma} f(z)dz = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, let me see if I can explain this clearly. For the problem I am stuck on, f(z) = z^2 + Im(z) and \Gamma is the square with verticies 0,-2i,2-2i,2

So this is basically a square in the lower right quadrant (positive real, negative imaginary) with the upper left point being the origin. Now, I had a different problem in which \Gamma was given to be |z|= 2, and the function, f(z) = Re(z), and so I was able to use Euler's formula to put the function in terms of cos(t) +isin(t), and Re(z) = cos(t). Taking the derivative of z(t) is easy, so I was able to evaluate the integral and get the correct answer. Now, I didn't know why Cauchy's formula didn't apply in that problem, as isn't f(z) differentiable on and within the domain enclosed by \Gamma ? This is where I was confused at first.

But back to the current problem, \Gamma is not the equation for a circle, so I do not know how I am supposed to interpret Im(z), or how to determine if it is differentiable on and within the domain enclosed by \Gamma (the square).

Can anyone clarify or help me understand how to parametrize the equation, and to help me determine if Cauchy's equation applies here (i.e. whether the answer is zero, or whether I have to perform the integration)? Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(z) is differentiable in the sense of having partial derivative wrt x and y. It is NOT differentiable in the complex sense. Im(z) is not differentiable. Consider it's derivative along the curves z(t)=t and z(t)=i*t (for real t). They are different. Complex differentiability means it's derivative doesn't depend on the direction.
 
Alright, that makes sense...but then how does one integrate Im(z)? Should I resolve it into real and imaginary components, i.e. a+ib, and integrate z^2 + ib? I am still confused about that part.

I guess what I mean is, if Cauchy's theorem does not apply, I have to integrate. I figure I integrate along the 4 different paths (each a line segment of the square), but what am I integrating? f(z) is z^2 + Im(z), but then what is f'(z), and how does this become a function z(t)?
 
Last edited:
Once you have parametrized z(t) for the contour then dz=z'(t)*dt. So your integral is just f(z(t))*z'(t)*dt. Which is just an ordinary integral with real and imaginary parts.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K