Cause of Lightning: What is the Real Explanation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Utter Novice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause Lightning
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the mechanism of charge generation in clouds leading to lightning. It questions the common explanation that ice particles in turbulent clouds create electrical charges by colliding with one another, suggesting that similar substances cannot generate a net charge. The analogy of static electricity from rubbing different materials is referenced to highlight the misunderstanding. The user seeks clarification on how charges are actually created in clouds, emphasizing the need for a better explanation of the triboelectric effect in this context. The conversation reflects a desire for a deeper understanding of atmospheric electricity and its role in lightning formation.
Utter Novice
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
First apologies for asking what is in all probability a misconceived question, but here goes.

The accounts of the cause of lightning seems to explain it in terms of turbulence in high clouds causing ice particles to become electrically charged by bumping into each other.

But this seems incorrect to me; there can surely be no charge created by substances of the same type colliding with one another.

Have I missed the point? If so (or indeed if not), how are charges in clouds created?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think the usual explanation is that molecules "rub against" one another and electrons are pulled off. This is the same as running a comb through your hair or shuffling your feet on a carpet. The electrons "stick" to one of the objects and accumulate until you touch a doorknob or your friend.
 
Thanks schip666. But my confusion is still in place. My understanding was that a charge can only be created if a substance rubs against another substance with a different triboelectric characteristic, hence there is a net transfer of electrons. But if particles of ice collide in the turbulence of a cloud, there can be no such net transfer because (definitionally) ice has the same triboelectric characteristics as itself.

I am sure I have something wrong here, but I don't know what!
 
You might want to read this article:

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/39381

Zz.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top