A Cavitation: radius of a bubble for compressible flow

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the liquid-vapor mass transfer in cavitation, governed by the vapor transport equation, which simplifies under incompressible flow conditions. The model aims to determine the mass transfer rate linked to the transport equation's right-hand side using the non-conservative form of the continuity equation. The evolution of a bubble's radius is described by the Rayleigh-Plesset equation, leading to a specific expression for the radius under incompressible flow conditions. A key question raised is whether this expression for bubble radius holds true in compressible flow scenarios. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately modeling cavitation phenomena.
JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
The liquid-vapor mass transfer (evaporation and condensation) is governed by the vapor transport equation:

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\alpha_l \rho) + \nabla \cdot (\alpha_l \rho \vec v) = \dot m^{+} + \dot m^{-}$$

In the incompressible flow case (constant density), it reduces to

$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\alpha_l) + \nabla \cdot (\alpha_l \vec v) = \frac{\dot m^{+} + \dot m^{-}}{\rho}
$$

The cavitation model of https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guenter-Schnerr-Professor-Dr-Inghabil/publication/296196752_Physical_and_Numerical_Modeling_of_Unsteady_Cavitation_Dynamics/links/56f6b62308ae81582bf2f940/Physical-and-Numerical-Modeling-of-Unsteady-Cavitation-Dynamics.pdf aims to determine the mass transfer rate linked to the RHS term of transport equation, using the non conservative form of the continuity equation i.e.

\begin{equation}

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho v) = 0 \Rightarrow

\end{equation}

\begin{equation}

\Rightarrow \nabla \cdot v = -\frac{1}{\rho}\Big( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + v \cdot \nabla \rho\Big) = -\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{D \rho}{D t} = \frac{\rho_l - \rho_v}{\rho} \frac{D \alpha_v}{D t}

\end{equation}

Where we used ##\rho = (1 - \alpha_v ) \rho_l + \alpha_v \rho_v##

However, for compressible compressible flow

\begin{equation}

\nabla \cdot v = \frac{\rho_l - \rho_v}{\rho} \frac{D \alpha_v}{D t} + \alpha_l \frac{D \rho_v}{D t} + (1 - \alpha_l) \frac{D \rho_l}{D t}

\end{equation}

Where the vapor volume fraction is

\alpha_v = \frac{V_v}{V_l + V_v} = \frac{\frac 4 3 n_0 \pi R^3}{1 + \frac 4 3 n_0 \pi R^3}

The bubble growing and collapsing can be described by the Rayleigh Plesset equation (please see first link). Dropping the second order terms and the viscosity effects between phases in the Plesset equation, the evolution of the radius of the bubble has the expression:

$$\frac{DR}{D t} = \Big( \frac 2 3 \frac{p_b - p}{\rho_l}\Big)^{1/2}$$

It follows that the radius of a bubble is given by

$$R = \Big( \frac{3\alpha_v}{(1-\alpha_v) n_0 4 \pi} \Big)^{1/3}$$

The above radius is obtained assuming incompressible flow.

Does the same expression hold for compressible flow?
 
Science news on Phys.org
There's a couple of typos in the above that are breaking ## \LaTeX ## but in any case you might get more replies if you ask the question like this:

We can derive* the following equation for the radius of a cavitation bubble for flow of an incompressible liquid:

$$R = \Big( \frac{3\alpha_v}{(1-\alpha_v) n_0 4 \pi} \Big)^{1/3}$$

Question: does the same expression hold for compressible flow?


* Derivation:
The liquid-vapor mass transfer (evaporation and condensation) is governed by the vapor transport equation:

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\alpha_l \rho) + \nabla \cdot (\alpha_l \rho \vec v) = \dot m^{+} + \dot m^{-}$$

In the incompressible flow case (constant density), it reduces to

$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\alpha_l) + \nabla \cdot (\alpha_l \vec v) = \frac{\dot m^{+} + \dot m^{-}}{\rho}
$$

The cavitation model of https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guenter-Schnerr-Professor-Dr-Inghabil/publication/296196752_Physical_and_Numerical_Modeling_of_Unsteady_Cavitation_Dynamics/links/56f6b62308ae81582bf2f940/Physical-and-Numerical-Modeling-of-Unsteady-Cavitation-Dynamics.pdf aims to determine the mass transfer rate linked to the RHS term of transport equation, using the non conservative form of the continuity equation i.e.

\begin{equation}

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho v) = 0 \Rightarrow

\end{equation}

\begin{equation}

\Rightarrow \nabla \cdot v = -\frac{1}{\rho}\Big( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + v \cdot \nabla \rho\Big) = -\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{D \rho}{D t} = \frac{\rho_l - \rho_v}{\rho} \frac{D \alpha_v}{D t}

\end{equation}

Where we used ##\rho = (1 - \alpha_v ) \rho_l + \alpha_v \rho_v##

However, for compressible compressible flow

\begin{equation}

\nabla \cdot v = \frac{\rho_l - \rho_v}{\rho} \frac{D \alpha_v}{D t} + \alpha_l \frac{D \rho_v}{D t} + (1 - \alpha_l) \frac{D \rho_l}{D t}

\end{equation}

Where the vapor volume fraction is

\alpha_v = \frac{V_v}{V_l + V_v} = \frac{\frac 4 3 n_0 \pi R^3}{1 + \frac 4 3 n_0 \pi R^3}

The bubble growing and collapsing can be described by the Rayleigh Plesset equation (please see first link). Dropping the second order terms and the viscosity effects between phases in the Plesset equation, the evolution of the radius of the bubble has the expression:

$$\frac{DR}{D t} = \Big( \frac 2 3 \frac{p_b - p}{\rho_l}\Big)^{1/2}$$

It follows that the radius of a bubble is given by

$$R = \Big( \frac{3\alpha_v}{(1-\alpha_v) n_0 4 \pi} \Big)^{1/3}$$
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
401
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
347
Replies
3
Views
455
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
517
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
3K