Centripetal acceleration speeding car problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a car navigating a banked curve with a specified angle and radius, where friction plays a role in maintaining motion without slipping. The context is centered around centripetal acceleration and the forces acting on the car as it travels along the curve.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the car, including friction and the normal force, while attempting to establish equations of motion. There is confusion regarding the definition and role of the normal force, denoted as R, and its relationship to the forces acting on the car.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the geometry of the banked curve and the forces involved. Some have offered clarifications about the nature of the forces and the angle of the bank, while others question the equations presented and the definitions used.

Contextual Notes

There is ongoing debate about the notation used for the normal force and its implications for understanding the problem. Additionally, participants are grappling with the correct application of forces in both vertical and horizontal directions, as well as the assumptions made about the banking angle.

Dumbledore211
Messages
111
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A car is traveling round a bend which is banked at an angle of 30 to the horizontal. The bend is assumed to be in the shape of an arc of a circle of radius 80m. the surface of the road is rough and the coefficient of friction between the tyres of the and the surface of the road is 0.3. Find the greatest speed and the least speed without slipping occurring

Homework Equations



Cp= v^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


So, here the bend is assumed to be an arc of a circle which is why the angle θ=30 is assumed to be formed at the center of the circle. The centripetal acceleration is also caused by the maximum frictional force which has a coefficient of 0.3. The equation that best describes the motion of the car is as follows frictional force - mgcosθ= mv^2/r
or, fs-mgcos=mv^2/r
or, μR- mgcosθ=mv^2/r
What befuddles me about this problem is the value of R which is supposed to be the normal reaction force. How do I go about solving for R?? Can any of you guys drop a hint as to where I am going wrong.??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All your equations look strange. Did you mix horizontal and vertical forces there?

How did you define R?
 
Dumbledore211 said:
So, here the bend is assumed to be an arc of a circle which is why the angle θ=30 is assumed to be formed at the center of the circle.
No, the arc is of unknown length. The arc is in the horizontal plane. The 30 degrees is the angle that the road is banked laterally, at all points along the arc.
The centripetal acceleration is also caused by the maximum frictional force which has a coefficient of 0.3.
That would be true on an unbanked road, but here the normal force also supplies some centripetal force. Correspondingly, only the horizontal component of the frictional force contributes to the centripetal force.
Write out the ∑F=ma equation for both vertical and horizontal. Don't forget that the frictional force can act up the slope, not just down the slope.
 
The 30 degrees is actually the angle created by the arc with the horizontal plane. So, the vertical force in this case is the normal force i.e R=mgcos30 and the horizontal component of the forces in this case are as follows mgsin30-fs=mv^2/r
or, mgsin30-μR=mv^2/r
or, mgsin30-0.3mgcos30=mv^2/r
or, gsin30-0.3gcos30=v^2/r
Are my set of equations correct?
 
Dumbledore211 said:
The 30 degrees is actually the angle created by the arc with the horizontal plane.
No, I believe you are still misreading it. The arc is horizontal, but the road surface slopes from one side to the other at an angle of 30 degrees. That's what 'banked' means.
 
I noticed recently that people seem to be using R for the normal force instead of the usual N. I don't know where this new convention started. First of all R is also the gas constant, so it can be confusing in some cases. Second, if R is intended to refer to the "Reaction" force to the body's weight and/or an outward force, it introduces a new level of confusion to Newton's third law. It is really just the perpendicular component of a stress in the surface that is equal and opposite to the stress in the body that is in contact with the surface.

AM
 
@Andrew mason It is just not me. Almost all my textbooks use R to denote the normal reaction force
 
Dumbledore211 said:
@Andrew mason It is just not me. Almost all my textbooks use R to denote the normal reaction force
By calling it a "reaction" force they are referring to another force (ie. its Third Law pair). It can be very complicated to determine what, exactly, it is a "reaction" to. It is not a third law pair to the weight of the body, for example.

All forces are third law "reaction" forces so singling out this as R "the Normal reaction force" is misleading and confusing at best.

AM
 
Dumbledore211 said:
The 30 degrees is actually the angle created by the arc with the horizontal plane. So, the vertical force in this case is the normal force i.e R=mgcos30 and the horizontal component of the forces in this case are as follows mgsin30-fs=mv^2/r
or, mgsin30-μR=mv^2/r
or, mgsin30-0.3mgcos30=mv^2/r
or, gsin30-0.3gcos30=v^2/r
Are my set of equations correct?
What does the sum of all forces (friction, normal force and gravity) have to equal?

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
827
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K