How Much Velocity is Needed at Point A to Leave the Track at Point B?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the necessary velocity at point A for a box to leave a circular track at point B. The key formula derived is va = √(gR(2 + 3sinΘ)), where va is the velocity at point A, g is the acceleration due to gravity, R is the radius of the track, and Θ is the angle of inclination. The participants clarify that the normal force becomes zero when the box loses contact with the track, and the centripetal force is provided by the component of weight acting radially, specifically W sin(Θ). The importance of understanding the forces acting on the box, including the normal force and centripetal force, is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its calculation (Fcentripetal = m V^2/R)
  • Knowledge of mechanical energy conservation principles (E = E')
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams and force analysis
  • Basic trigonometry, particularly sine functions in relation to angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of centripetal force in circular motion
  • Explore mechanical energy conservation in different physical systems
  • Learn how to construct and interpret free body diagrams for complex systems
  • Investigate the effects of angle and radius on motion in circular tracks
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone involved in mechanics or dynamics, particularly those studying circular motion and forces acting on objects in motion.

terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



http://www.sumoware.com/images/temp/xzfrbardcbliotkt.png
[/B]
A box travels in a circular track like the picture above.
How much velocity it must have in point A to get out of the track when reaching point B ?

Homework Equations


Fcentripetal = m V^2/R
E = E'

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I draw the free body diagram of the forces in point B
http://www.sumoware.com/images/temp/xzstkkpbgobpmjmi.png

Actually, I want to draw the normal force, but I don't know where the normal force direction is.
I know that the centripetal force is the force that's accelerating to the center.
So, I think that Wb sin Θ is the same as the centripetal force.
I use
Wb sin Θ= F centripetal
mg sin Θ= m v^2/r
g sin Θ= v^2/r
v = √(g r sin Θ)

Then, I use the mechanical energy conservation formula. (I assume that the point A is zero in y axis)
E = E'
1/2 mva^2 = mgh + 1/2 m vb^2
1/2 va^2 = gh + 1/2 vb^2
va^2 = 2gh + vb^2
va^2 = 2g(R+R sin Θ) + vb^2
va^2 = 2g(R+R sin Θ) + (√(g r sin Θ))^2
va^2 = 2g(R+R sin Θ) + g r sin Θ
va^2 = 2gR+2gRsinΘ+gr sin Θ
va^2 = 2gR+3gRsinΘ
va^2 = gR (2+3sinΘ)
va = √(gR (2+3sinΘ))

But, I'm not sure my answer is right.
What I doubt is when I think the W sinΘ equals centripetal force and when I don't know where the normal force direction is pointing. Actually, I want to use ∑F = ma , but I just know the weight force to draw.
Please help me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
terryds said:
Actually, I want to draw the normal force, but I don't know where the normal force direction is.
At the point where the box is just falling out of the track, what do you think the magnitude of the normal force will be?
 
haruspex said:
At the point where the box is just falling out of the track, what do you think the magnitude of the normal force will be?
Hmm... I think it is the same as W but with opposite direction ? Or maybe W sin theta ?
 
terryds said:
Hmm... I think it is the same as W but with opposite direction ? Or maybe W sin theta ?
If there's still all that force exerted between the box and the track, why is it about to fall of the track?
 
haruspex said:
If there's still all that force exerted between the box and the track, why is it about to fall of the track?
Maybe because the weight is bigger than the normal force, or there is no normal force..
But, i don't know how to determine the normal force in this problem
 
terryds said:
Maybe because the weight is bigger than the normal force
Those forces both act sort-of downwards, so that isn't going to explain it.
terryds said:
or there is no normal force
Exactly. You lose contact with a surface when there's no force holding you to it, and so no normal force reacting.
Hence the direction of the normal force does not matter for this question, but, for future reference, if either body has a tangent plane at the point of contact then the normal force is normal to that plane. Note that if they both have tangent planes they will necessarily be the same. If neither has a tangent plane it becomes impossible to say.
 
haruspex said:
Those forces both act sort-of downwards, so that isn't going to explain it.

Exactly. You lose contact with a surface when there's no force holding you to it, and so no normal force reacting.
Hence the direction of the normal force does not matter for this question, but, for future reference, if either body has a tangent plane at the point of contact then the normal force is normal to that plane. Note that if they both have tangent planes they will necessarily be the same. If neither has a tangent plane it becomes impossible to say.

Thanks for your explanation.
But, what about its centripetal force ? Does it equal W sin theta ?
And, is my answer to the problem correct ?
 
terryds said:
Thanks for your explanation.
But, what about its centripetal force ? Does it equal W sin theta ?
And, is my answer to the problem correct ?
Yes. To keep on the track, the acceleration must be v2/r, no more, no less. The net force in the radial direction will never be less than mv2/r because the normal force will increase as necessary to prevent the block breaking into the track. But if the net force exceeds the centripetal force, even when the normal force has fallen to zero, then it will accelerate faster than v2/r radially and leave the track. The only source of such a force is g, and its radial component will be W sin(theta).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terryds

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K