Centripetal Force of a particle

AI Thread Summary
At the top of a loop in uniform circular motion, a particle experiences gravitational force (Fg) and normal force (Fn), but the minimum velocity occurs when Fn is set to zero. This condition indicates that gravity alone is sufficient to keep the particle in contact with the loop. If the particle's speed is any slower, it will not maintain contact and will fall off the track. The faster the particle moves, the greater the required normal force to keep it on the loop. Thus, setting Fn to zero helps determine the critical speed needed to prevent falling off the loop.
vladittude0583
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
This is regarding a particle traveling in a uniform circular motion around a "loop."

I understand that at the very top of the loop, the particle experiences Fg (Force of Gravity) and also Fn (Normal Force) due to contact with the surface, but also experiences acceleration in the "-y" direction. My question is why is it considered minimum velocity when you set the Fn to zero to find the velocity at the very top? Using Newton's Second Law, Fnet, y = may

-Fn - Fg = m (-ay)

The way I am interpreting it is that there is really no Fn to support you at the very top because its pretty much Fg right?

Can someone clarify this idea for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vladittude0583 said:
This is regarding a particle traveling in a uniform circular motion around a "loop."

I understand that at the very top of the loop, the particle experiences Fg (Force of Gravity) and also Fn (Normal Force) due to contact with the surface, but also experiences acceleration in the "-y" direction. My question is why is it considered minimum velocity when you set the Fn to zero to find the velocity at the very top? Using Newton's Second Law, Fnet, y = may

-Fn - Fg = m (-ay)

The way I am interpreting it is that there is really no Fn to support you at the very top because its pretty much Fg right?

Can someone clarify this idea for me?


Hi there,

The way I will interprete is that at the top of the loop, it is very much the minimum velocity required for you to be suspended just by g acting downwards only. Any other forces, be it normal contact force or centripetal force, is there to prevent you from flying off the loop only.
 
thiotimoline said:
Hi there,

The way I will interprete is that at the top of the loop, it is very much the minimum velocity required for you to be suspended just by g acting downwards only. Any other forces, be it normal contact force or centripetal force, is there to prevent you from flying off the loop only.

So, are you saying that if there was an additional force besides that of gravity itself, than the particle would fall of the loop at the top?
 
vladittude0583 said:
My question is why is it considered minimum velocity when you set the Fn to zero to find the velocity at the very top?
Because the faster you go, the greater the acceleration and the greater normal force needed to keep you on the track. So you can set Fn = 0 to find the minimum speed that still just barely keeps you in contact with the track. If you go any slower, you will fall off the track and never make it through the loop.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top