What is the significance of the cesium-133 atom in defining the second?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dandy Candy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
Dandy Candy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am a new member in your forum and I am very pleased to join it. This my first theard in this great forum.

My Q.:

The unit of time was originally defined as 1/86400 of the mean solar day. Because of irregularities in the Earth roatation, the definition was changed to the '' emphemeris second '', i.e., 1/31556925.9747 of the tropical year 1900. In 1967 , this definition was replaced.

the second is the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine of the ground state of the cesius-133 atom.

The defintion is based on the atomic clock. One of the best atomic clocks ( NIST-F1) is precise to within about 1 second in 60 million years, or 5 parts in 10^16. Commercially available atomic clocks are precise to within 3 parts in 10^12.

I didn't understand this paragraph .. it's from my textbook !

Concepts in Engineering
Second Edition
Mark Holtzapple and W. Reece
McGraw-Hill
2008Would you mind explaining it, please?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
no reply ?!

:(
 
Dandy Candy said:
The defintion is based on the atomic clock. One of the best atomic clocks ( NIST-F1) is precise to within about 1 second in 60 million years, or 5 parts in 10^16. Commercially available atomic clocks are precise to within 3 parts in 10^12.

I didn't understand this paragraph .. it's from my textbook !

It means that if you set the clock "exactly", and then wait 60 million years, it could be reading the wrong time. But, it will only be off by about 1 second or so, after all that time.

"5 parts in 10^16" means the time could be off by 5 seconds after having run for 10^16 seconds (that's about 300 million years).

Or it could be off by 5 nanoseconds after having run for 10^16 nanoseconds (that's 16.5 weeks). A nanosecond is a billionth of a second or 10^-9 seconds.

no reply ?!

Many of us (in USA) were sleeping when you first posted.
 
Redbelly98

Thanks a lot !

: )
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top