Chain Rule Paradox or Am I Doing Something Wrong?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the chain rule in calculus, specifically addressing potential misunderstandings when differentiating composite functions. Participants explore various examples, including linear and non-linear functions, and examine the implications of the chain rule in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that for h(x) = ax and g(x) = bx, the derivatives h'(x) = a and g'(x) = b lead to f'(x) = ab, but question the application of the chain rule.
  • Others clarify that g'(h(x)) evaluates to b, and thus f'(x) should equal ab, consistent with the chain rule.
  • A participant introduces a different scenario with h(x) = x^2 and g(x) = x^2, arguing that the derivatives lead to confusion regarding the expected result of f'(x).
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of tracking variables and the context of differentiation when applying the chain rule, especially with non-linear functions.
  • There is a discussion about the consistency of results when using different definitions and approaches to differentiation, with some participants expressing confusion over the outcomes.
  • A later reply indicates that understanding the variable with respect to which differentiation occurs is crucial for applying the chain rule correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the chain rule, particularly in cases involving non-linear functions. There is no consensus on the resolution of the confusion regarding the derivatives in these contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the first derivatives in certain examples are not constant functions, which complicates the application of the chain rule. The discussion highlights the need to carefully consider the variables involved in differentiation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators in calculus, particularly those grappling with the chain rule and its application to composite functions.

V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
If h(x) = ax, g(x) = bx and f(x) = g(h(x)).

Wouldn't h'(x) = a? And g'(x) = b? And f'(x) = ab?

But the chain rule says f'(x) must equal h'(x)g'(h(x)), so that means f'(x) = ab(ax) = (a^2)bx.

Am I missing something obvious?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
If h(x) = ax, g(x) = bx and f(x) = g(h(x)).

Wouldn't h'(x) = a? And g'(x) = b? And f'(x) = ab?

But the chain rule says f'(x) must equal h'(x)g'(h(x)), so that means f'(x) = ab(ax) = (a^2)bx.

Am I missing something obvious?

Perhaps.

h'(x) = a. Yes. It's a constant function.
g'(x) = b. Yes. It's a constant function.

The chain rule says that f'(x) = h'(x)g'(h(x)). Yes.

What's g'(h(x)) ?

That's g'(whatever) = b

What's h'(x)?

That's h'(whatever) = a

What's h'(x)g'(h(x)) ?

That's ab, just like it is supposed to be.
 
f(x)=g(h(x))=bh(x). f'(x)=bh'(x)=ba. The point is that g'(u)=b, no matter what u is, even if u=h(x).
 
Okay, but if h(x) = x^2, g(x) = x^2 and f(x) = g(h(x))

Now by your logic f'(x) should be 4x^2 not 4x^3, since h'(x) = 2x and g'(x) = 2x.
Then f'(x) = 2x * 2x = 2x^2.

I am still confused..
 
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
Okay, but if h(x) = x^2, g(x) = x^2 and f(x) = g(h(x))

Now by your logic f'(x) should be 4x^2 not 4x^3, since h'(x) = 2x and g'(x) = 2x.
Then f'(x) = 2x * 2x = 2x^2.

I am still confused..

In this case the first derivitives are not constant functions. You need to keep track of what your x's are. Don't let the letters trick you.

Work it through. Chain rule says h'(x)g'(h(x))

h'(x) = 2x.
h(x) = x^2
remember that g'(y) = 2y
so
g'(h(x)) = 2h(x) = 2x^2

Put it together, f'(x) = 2x * 2x^2 = 4x^3

And since f(x) = h(x)^2 = (x^2)^2 = x^4, this result is correct.
 
So if both equations in the chain are linear I use g'(whatever) and h'(whatever), but if one of them isn't what I take the derivative with respect to matters? Why?

If I use mathman's definition I get that d/dx (x^2)^2 = 4x^2 and if I use jrbriggs444's definition I get that d/dx a(bx) = (b^2)ax. What is wrong?
 
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
So if both equations in the chain are linear I use g'(whatever) and h'(whatever), but if one of them isn't what I take the derivative with respect to matters?
No, it's entirely consistent. You just have to understand that g' here does not mean differentiate g wrt x. It means differentiate g wrt whatever g is a function of, namely h.
If I use mathman's definition I get that d/dx (x^2)^2 = 4x^2
I assume you mean h(x) = x2, g(u) = u2, where u = h.
g'(u) = 2u = 2h(x) = 2x2; h'(x) = 2x; chain rule gives 2x2.2x = 4x3
and if I use jrbriggs444's definition I get that d/dx a(bx) = (b^2)ax.
No. jrbriggs444's first post worked this through and got ab. How are you getting (b2)ax?
 
Thanks, haruspex's post actually cleared my confusion!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K