MHB Challenge: Create 64 with two 4's

  • Thread starter Thread starter soroban
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
AI Thread Summary
The challenge is to create the number 64 using two 4's with various mathematical operations. Solutions presented include complex expressions involving logarithms and factorials, such as $-\lg \, \log_{\sqrt{4}} \, \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{...\sqrt{4}}}}_{\text{65 times}}$ and $4^{\left(\log \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{e^{4!}}}}\right)}$. An alternate solution is $4^{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{4!}}}\right)}$, which simplifies the approach without using logarithms. The term "Perelman-like" is used to describe the logarithmic method, referencing a related problem from Yakov Perelman's work. The discussion highlights the creativity and complexity involved in solving mathematical challenges.
soroban
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Using any of \{+,\;-,\;\times,\;\div,\;x^y,\;\sqrt{x},\;x!\}

. . create 64 with two 4's.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Challenge

In base 15:

44
 
Re: Challenge

(Clapping)
 
Re: Challenge

A Perelman-like solution suffices :

$-\lg \, \log_{\sqrt{4}} \, \underbrace{\sqrt{\sqrt{...\sqrt{4}}}}_{\text{65 times}}$

Or even,

$4^\left ({\log \sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{e^{4!}}}}} \right )$

But as $\log$ is not desired, a twist around the base of logarithm of the latter should do :

$\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{4^{4!}}}}$
 
Last edited:
Re: Challenge

Hello, mathbalarka!

That's it! . . . Nice reasoning!

Alternate form: .4^{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\sqrt{4!}}}\right)}
 
Re: Challenge

Okay, thanks! The other form didn't click to me, really nice!

Now, in my post, the first form using logarithm is referred to as "Perelman-like" as another related, but twisted problem was given in Yakov Perelman's Mathematics Is Fun. He refers a challenger in a congress of physicist in Odessa. I couldn't find further reference, so just named this after him. (a year ago when I found out this kind of approach is in general very doable for these problems)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top