Challenging problem corrrection no sine and no cosine law

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosine Law Sine
AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a geometric problem involving an isosceles triangle ABC and an equilateral triangle BCF, sharing side BC. The angles of the triangles are specified, including angle DAE at 20 degrees and angle EDC at 10 degrees. The challenge is to determine angle EFC without using the sine and cosine laws. Participants are encouraged to derive seven equations involving the unknown angles labeled a through g. The problem emphasizes the complexity of the solution, suggesting the use of linear algebra and matrices for resolution.
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
sorry about the mistake in my last post. I miswrote the bottom vertex of the equilateral triangle.

Let me re-state the problem correctly

This is the 3rd and final question I post from the book, The Unsolvable and the Solvable.

It is NOT a homework question. This is something for everyone to try out for interest.

Consider an isoceles triangle ABC and an equilateral triangle BCF which share the side BC as shown below. Please ignore the dotted lines.

......A


......D
.........E

....B_________________C



......F

D is a point on side AB and E is a point on side AC.

angle DAE=20 degrees
angle DEA=20 degrees
angle EDC=10 degrees
angle ECD=10 degrees
angle DBC=80 degrees
angle DCB=70 degrees
angle BDC=30 degrees

WITHOUT using the sine and cosine law, determine angle EFC.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Label the following unknown angles:

a = BDF b = FDC c = DEF d = FEC e = BFD f = DFE g = EFC

Then, write 7 different equations involving them.

For example, a + e + 140 = 180.

Once you have 7 equations with 7 unknowns, it can be solved. Though, it is messy. If you know linear algebra, I would use matrices to solve the system.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top