Graduate Change in Fermi level with gradient of doping concentration

Click For Summary
In a degenerate n-type semiconductor with a doping concentration gradient, the Fermi level remains constant throughout the system at equilibrium, but the energy levels of the conduction and valence bands change based on the local doping concentration. The relationship between the Fermi level and the conduction/valence band energies is influenced by the doping profile, particularly in regions like p-n junctions where the doping concentration varies. In the depletion region, the energy difference between the conduction band and the Fermi level shifts due to electrostatic potential changes caused by unbalanced charge. To accurately determine these energy variations, one must consider the local dopant concentration and solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Understanding the intrinsic Fermi level's behavior in this context requires a deeper exploration of these physical principles.
HARSHARAJ
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In a degenerate n type semiconductor, when the doping concentration has a gradient(say -ve gradient), then how fermi energy level and intrinsic Fermi energy levels will depend upon the concentration gradient?
~If anyone knows anything about it, kindly help.
 
Last edited:
Hi, .
Fermi level is a property of the system at equilibrium so its value is the same everywhere within the system ( if there is no current flow).

However, the energy of the conduction and valence bands relative to the Fermi level does depend on the doping concentration.

Check this link. It gives you all the equations and graphs.
http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/extrinsi.htm
 
My apology. I just realized I gave you an incomplete answer.

It is true that at equilibrium, the Fermi level is the same everywhere in the system.
However, the difference between the Fermi energy and conduction/valence band energy depends not only on the doping concentration but also on the doping profile.
Take, for example, an energy diagram of a p-n junction at equilibrium. This is a case when you have a change of doping concentration. In the n - region and far away from the junction, the conduction band bottom is close to the Fermi level. On the other side (p - region), the top of the conduction band is close to the Fermi level. But in the depletion mode, you have an electrostatic potential that adds to the value of the conduction band bottom (and valence band top).
But in the depletion region, the difference between the bottom of the conduction band and Fermi level changes from the bulk p region value to the bulk n region value. The change of the electron energy is due to potential energy difference because of unbalanced charge in the depletion region.

So, in general, the difference between the energy of a conduction (or valence) band will depend not only on local dopant concentration but also double integrated net charge density. So, given the dopant concentration profile, you really have to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation to get the answer.


Henryk
 
Thank you for the reply, the answer that you provided regarding the position of Ef and variation in position in Ec and Ev, I have also arrived there but what I didn't understood (physically) quite well is how and why the intrinsic fermi level changes.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
81K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
38K