bohrpiphi
- 2
- 0
I want to find a matrix such that it takes a spin z ket in the z basis,
[itex]| \; S_z + >_z[/itex]
and operates on it, giving me a spin z ket in the x basis,
[itex]U \; | \; S_z + >_z = | \; S_z + >_x[/itex]
I would have thought that I could find this transformation operator matrix simply by using the following argument:
[itex]U \; | \; S_z >_z = | \; S_z >_x[/itex]
[itex]_z< S_z \; | U \; | \; S_z >_z = _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex]
Therefore, elements of U are given by the inner product [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex]
However, to compute the inner product [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex] , I need to know [itex]| \; S_z >_x[/itex], which is exactly what I am trying to find.
Where is my misunderstanding?
I have shown that the matrix given by the inner products [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_x >_z[/itex] gives the matrix:
[itex]\begin{matrix} 1/\sqrt{2} & 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} & -1/\sqrt{2} \end{matrix}[/itex],
which cannot be correct, since [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_x >_z \neq _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex].
However, starting in the x basis and calculating [itex]| \; S_z >_x[/itex] shows that the above matrix works. I imagine this is not a coincidence, but it seems to be implying that [itex]| \; S_z >_x = | \; S_x + >_z[/itex].
This is not a homework question.
[itex]| \; S_z + >_z[/itex]
and operates on it, giving me a spin z ket in the x basis,
[itex]U \; | \; S_z + >_z = | \; S_z + >_x[/itex]
I would have thought that I could find this transformation operator matrix simply by using the following argument:
[itex]U \; | \; S_z >_z = | \; S_z >_x[/itex]
[itex]_z< S_z \; | U \; | \; S_z >_z = _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex]
Therefore, elements of U are given by the inner product [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex]
However, to compute the inner product [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex] , I need to know [itex]| \; S_z >_x[/itex], which is exactly what I am trying to find.
Where is my misunderstanding?
I have shown that the matrix given by the inner products [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_x >_z[/itex] gives the matrix:
[itex]\begin{matrix} 1/\sqrt{2} & 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} & -1/\sqrt{2} \end{matrix}[/itex],
which cannot be correct, since [itex]_z< S_z \; | \; S_x >_z \neq _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x[/itex].
However, starting in the x basis and calculating [itex]| \; S_z >_x[/itex] shows that the above matrix works. I imagine this is not a coincidence, but it seems to be implying that [itex]| \; S_z >_x = | \; S_x + >_z[/itex].
This is not a homework question.