I want to find a matrix such that it takes a spin z ket in the z basis,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex] | \; S_z + >_z [/itex]

and operates on it, giving me a spin z ket in the x basis,

[itex] U \; | \; S_z + >_z = | \; S_z + >_x [/itex]

I would have thought that I could find this transformation operator matrix simply by using the following argument:

[itex] U \; | \; S_z >_z = | \; S_z >_x [/itex]

[itex] _z< S_z \; | U \; | \; S_z >_z = _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x [/itex]

Therefore, elements of U are given by the inner product [itex] _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x [/itex]

However, to compute the inner product [itex] _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x [/itex] , I need to know [itex] | \; S_z >_x [/itex], which is exactly what I am trying to find.

Where is my misunderstanding?

I have shown that the matrix given by the inner products [itex] _z< S_z \; | \; S_x >_z [/itex] gives the matrix:

[itex] \begin{matrix} 1/\sqrt{2} & 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} & -1/\sqrt{2} \end{matrix} [/itex],

which cannot be correct, since [itex] _z< S_z \; | \; S_x >_z \neq _z< S_z \; | \; S_z >_x [/itex].

However, starting in the x basis and calculating [itex] | \; S_z >_x [/itex] shows that the above matrix works. I imagine this is not a coincidence, but it seems to be implying that [itex] | \; S_z >_x = | \; S_x + >_z [/itex].

This is not a homework question.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Change of Basis For Pauli Matrix From Z Diagonal to X Diagonal Basis

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**