Change of sign on Green's functions (Maths problem)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gonadas91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Functions Sign
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of non-interacting Green's functions for a channel of electrons, specifically focusing on the integral representation of the Green's function, G_{0}(\omega). Initially, the user derived G_{0}(\omega) for a constant density of states, resulting in a dependence on the sign of the real part of the excitation energies. The user later explored the case with a Lorentzian density of states and utilized contour integration to derive a modified Green's function. Ultimately, the confusion regarding the limit as \Lambda approaches infinity was resolved, clarifying the behavior of the imaginary part in the Green's function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques
  • Knowledge of density of states concepts
  • Basic principles of complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Green's functions in many-body physics
  • Learn about contour integration in complex analysis
  • Explore the implications of different density of states on Green's functions
  • Investigate the role of limits in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, mathematicians interested in complex analysis, and students studying quantum mechanics and many-body theory will benefit from this discussion.

gonadas91
Messages
75
Reaction score
5
Hi, I am trying to solve a model where Non-interacting Green functions take part it. It has happened something that is spinning my head and I hope someone could help. The non interacting Green function for a chanel of electrons is:
G_{0}(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\epsilon\nu(\epsilon)\frac{1}{\omega - \epsilon + i\delta\text{sign($\omega$)}}
where I am integrating over the whole energy spectrum since I consider the chanel as a whole. I have to mention that I am at T=0 and \nu(\epsilon) is the density of states on the chanel. Ok, suppose we have a constant density of states. Then, the real part of the integral cancels (gives a cosntant part which is irrelevant) and the imaginary part, since \delta\to 0 becomes a delta function inside. Therefore:
G_{0}(\omega)=-i \nu\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\epsilon\delta(\omega - \epsilon)=-i\nu\text{$sign(Re(\omega))$}

We notice the dependence with the REAL part of the excitation energies \omega. Now, imagine that instead of a constant density of states, this density of states is a Lorentzian of the type:
\frac{\Lambda}{\Lambda^{2} + \epsilon^{2}}
Then the integral above can be completed in the complex plane using contour integration, and the result gives:
G_{0}(\omega)=\frac{\nu}{\frac{\omega}{\Lambda} + i\text{$sign(Im(\omega))$}} + \frac{i\nu\Lambda\text{$sign(Re(\omega))$}}{\Lambda^{2}+\omega^{2}}

Now, taking \Lambda\to\infty should gives us the result of the flat density of states but instead it gives the sign with the imaginary part! Someone can help on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok now doubt is solved I just did it at the end so this post can be closed ;)

It is just that I took wrong the limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K