Change of variables for 2nd order differential

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
test1234
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Hi there, I'm having some difficulty in understanding how the change of variables by considering a retarded time frame can be obtained for this particular eqn I have.

Say I have this original equation,
[itex] \frac{\partial A}{\partial z} + \beta_1 \frac{\partial A}{\partial t}+ \frac{i \beta_2}{2} \frac{\partial^2 A}{\partial t^2}+\frac{\alpha}{2} A = i \gamma |A|^2 A[/itex]

Considering a frame of reference moving with speed [itex]\nu_g[/itex] (i.e. group velocity), a new variable T can be defined as follows
[itex]T=t-\frac{z}{\nu_g} = t-\beta_1 z[/itex]
where [itex]\beta_1=\frac{1}{\nu_g}[/itex]

Apparently, the differential equation can be reduced to
[itex] \frac{\partial A}{\partial z} -\frac{i \beta_2}{2} \frac{\partial^2 A}{\partial T^2}+\frac{\alpha}{2} A = i \gamma |A|^2 A[/itex]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From my understanding, the first order differential term [itex]\beta_1 \frac{\partial A}{\partial t}[/itex] disappears because
[itex] \frac{\partial A}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial A}{\partial T} \times \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}[/itex]

Since
[itex] T =t-\frac{z}{\nu_g} = t-\beta_1 z \\<br /> \therefore \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = 1-\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\beta_1 z) \\<br /> = 1-\beta_1 \nu_g = 0 \phantom{0} (\because \beta_1=\frac{1}{\nu_g})[/itex]

Hence,
[itex] \frac{\partial A}{\partial t} = 0[/itex]

However, I can't wrap my head around how to transform the second derivative [itex]\frac{\partial^2 A}{\partial t^2}[/itex]?

[itex] \frac{\partial^2 A}{\partial t^2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\frac{\partial A}{\partial t})<br /> = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\frac{\partial A}{\partial T} \times \frac{\partial T}{\partial t})[/itex]

Which seems to give me zero following from the above argument for the first order differential term [itex]\frac{\partial A}{\partial t}[/itex]...
Am I missing something here? I would really appreciate if anyone could help. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To me it seems that the change of variable (z,t) => (z,T) leads to

∂T/∂t=1

z is an independent variable and therefore

∂z/∂t=0

The wave packet represented by this equation might well have an average position.
But don't name it "z", name it something else than the independent variable z of the wave equation.
 
Thanks maajdl for the quick reply. Hmm... if ∂T/∂t=1, then the first order derivative of ∂A/∂T will still exist...

Based on my understanding, z is the direction of propagation of the pulse. So the pulse travels with a group velocity [itex]\nu_g[/itex].