Charge Buildup & Equalization on Batteries A & B

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Evil Bunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of charge in batteries, specifically addressing whether there is a buildup of charge on the terminals of batteries and the implications for current flow when connecting two batteries. The scope includes theoretical considerations of battery operation and the underlying chemical processes involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether there is a buildup of negative charge on the (-) pole and positive charge on the (+) pole of batteries, with some asserting that there is no buildup.
  • One participant suggests that a voltage difference exists between the poles, which could imply a charge difference, but emphasizes that this does not necessarily mean there is a significant buildup of charge.
  • Another participant argues that the chemical reactions in the battery create and sustain a voltage difference without a substantial charge buildup on the terminals.
  • There is a suggestion that connecting the batteries without completing the circuit would lead to a temporary redistribution of charges, but ultimately no sustained current flow would occur.
  • Some participants clarify that the process of charge movement is tied to the chemical reactions within the battery, which require a closed circuit to continue.
  • Discussion also touches on generators, with questions raised about charge behavior in generators compared to batteries.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether there is a significant buildup of charge on the battery terminals. While some assert there is no buildup, others propose that a voltage difference exists due to charge distribution, leading to ongoing debate without consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of charge buildup and voltage difference, as well as the assumptions about the behavior of electric fields in relation to battery operation. The nuances of chemical reactions and their role in charge movement are also not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals studying battery technology, electrical engineering, or those curious about the principles of electrochemistry and charge dynamics in electrical systems.

  • #31
Drakkith said:
The generator is exerting a force on the electrons, but since they have nowhere to go no charge builds up.

They have all kinds of places to go. The issue at hand is that they only want to go to one place. Back to the "return" of the generator. The question is why? It doesn't have anything to do with charge, apparently... You started to talk about positive ions exerting an opposite force. That sounded almost like it had to do with charge, so I'm still missing something.

It has been explained repeatedly and in many different ways that a circuit must be completed. This much I do understand. What I don't understand is why... I thought the whole reason an electron ever moved in the first place was because of a "charge" or a "force" being exerted onto it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
When you have a dry lead acid battery, fresh out of the box... it's useless. No voltage.

When you add the acid to it, what happens?

Does the word "charge" enter the picture at all here?
 
  • #33
If you take two parallel metal plates and use connecting wires to join the plates to the poles of a battery then you will have a capacitor that charges exponentially with time. There will be a negative charge build up on the plate connected to the negative pole of the battery and a positive charge build up on the opposite plate.If now the wires are kept in place but the metal plates are removed then you still have a capacitor but of a much smaller capacitance.The charge which is now mainly stored on the ends of the wires will be correspondingly smaller.If the wires are now removed you will still have a capacitor but this time the poles of the battery itself constitute the plates.The charge stored can be calculated from Q=CV where C is the effective capacitance of the battery poles.
 
  • #34
Dadface said:
If you take two parallel metal plates and use connecting wires to join the plates to the poles of a battery then you will have a capacitor that charges exponentially with time. There will be a negative charge build up on the plate connected to the negative pole of the battery and a positive charge build up on the opposite plate.

What if you only used one plate and connecting wire on (pick a pole, any pole). Would a charge build up on it?

If not, why not?
 
  • #35
Evil Bunny said:
What if you only used one plate and connecting wire on (pick a pole, any pole). Would a charge build up on it?

If not, why not?

You could have any arrangement at all.If changes are made then the capacitance changes also and this will result in a redistribution of the charge build up.
 
  • #36
Here's how I think it works:

At equilibrium each pole will have a certain potential relative to the electrolyte. For example, if the equilibrium potential difference between the pole and electrolyte happens to be 1V, then it "costs" 1 eV to transfer an electron from higher to lower potential. The reason the potential is built up despite this "cost" is that there is a simultaneous release of (in this case) 1 eV from the chemical reaction that transfers an electron from higher to lower potential.

Any conductor attached to the pole is, in a way, like an extension of the pole. At least in the sense that it gets the same potential as the pole, as long as there's no significant voltage drop due to the current when the circuit is closed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K