Charge density in a resistor issue

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit problem involving a resistor characterized by its area, length, and a specific electrical conductance function. The original poster seeks to determine the electric field within the resistor and the charge density at its center.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric field, charge density, and current density, referencing Ohm's law and Maxwell's equations. Questions arise regarding the uniformity of the electric field and the implications of charge distribution within the resistor.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights and references to relevant equations, suggesting pathways for further exploration. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations regarding charge density and electric field behavior in resistors, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of specific formulas from the original poster, which has led to questions about the assumptions made in their calculations. Additionally, the discussion touches on the implications of charge accumulation and symmetry in the context of resistors connected to a voltage source.

oronanschel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



given simple circuit with V the voltage connected to a resistor
with area A, length d and electrical conductance: b*e^-2x/d
after my computations the resistance

R=d*(e^2-1)/(2bA)


Homework Equations



what is the electrical field E in the center of the resistor?

The Attempt at a Solution



i think it must be 0 because i can't think of
why it will be charged
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,
Since you didn't provide any formulae, as to how you'd reached your result, let me ask you this: are you familiar with the relation: \sigma E = j?(Local variation of Ohm's law) Where sigma is the conductance, and j is the current density.
Since the voltage is constant, E must be uniform, simple integration should yield what you're looking for...
I hope that helps somewhat,
Daniel
P.S
Clearly, by following the steps above, you can find that the density won't be zero, per se
The "continuity equation", however, if you recall, is still satisfied(naturally), and generates that equilibrium we all seek...
 
Last edited:
yeah..oops, this is the second question and I managed that one
I know the formula :

\sigma E = j(Local variation of Ohm's law)

the 3rd question was the charge density
in the center of the resistor

that i couldn't figure out..
 
Have you tried Maxwell's equation->\overrightarrow{\nabla} \cdot \overrightarrow{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}
Does that get you any closer?
Daniel
 
becasue E is E(x), can i say that

\overrightarrow{\nabla} \cdot \overrightarrow{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}
is
\frac{dE(x)}{dx} = \frac{\rho(x)}{\epsilon_0}

?
then problem is solved
 
Absolutely! But of course, this could only work by stating that the area(A) is also only dependent on x... so long as that's maintained, you're prefectly correct.
Did you end-up reaching the desired answer?
I hope was I able to provide some aid,
Daniel
 
it doesn't say what is the correct answer but it satisfy me.

so any resistor is also charged (when connected to voltage)? sound weird to me
because out of symmetry why it would be charged positively
and not the opposite?
 
Since the current travels via a relative value known as the "drift velocity", the charges that encounter the most resistance will also tend to accumulate more in the region where that applies(where the resistivity is greater). This is a phenomenon which is typically observed, but in a different case, as "Skin effects":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect"
Be sure however to note that the most valuable equation for conserving the physical aspect of this problem, the "continuity equation" is left unchanged:
\overrightarrow{\nabla} \cdot \overrightarrow{j} = -\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} which ensures the integrity of the solution.
I pray that shed some light on the issue at hand,
Daniel
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love physics

thank u very much Daniel
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K