Charge density on the surface of a conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the charge density on the surface of a conductor, specifically the relationship between the surface charge densities σ1 and σ2. Participants emphasize that the electric field inside the conductor must be zero, leading to a necessary correction of a sign error in the initial equations. The total charge Q of the conductor is a known variable, which allows for the establishment of a second equation relating σ1 and σ2. The conclusion confirms that the solution provided is correct after addressing the initial mistakes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, particularly the behavior of electric fields in conductors.
  • Familiarity with surface charge density concepts, specifically σ1 and σ2.
  • Knowledge of charge conservation principles in electrostatics.
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving electric fields and charge densities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields in conductors under electrostatic conditions.
  • Learn about the implications of Gauss's Law in determining charge distributions.
  • Explore the relationship between surface charge density and electric field strength.
  • Investigate common mistakes in electrostatic calculations and how to avoid them.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics, particularly those interested in charge distribution on conductors.

marcos7615
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
There is a flat conductor, charge Q, very large surface area S and thickness
“a“ parallel to a surface charge distribution of density σ = 2Q/S
and separated a distance "d" from it, as shown in the figure. It is requested:

- The charge density σ1 on the outer surface of the conductor
of the load distribution.
Relevant Equations
σ = 2Q/S
1653165597565.png


I have tried to solve the problem by setting as a condition that the electric field inside the conductor has to be 0, but in this way I have two unknowns (σ1 and σ2):
1653166686126.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
marcos7615 said:
I have tried to solve the problem by setting as a condition that the electric field inside the conductor has to be 0, but in this way I have two unknowns (σ1 and σ2):
1653168712217.png

Check the signs of the terms on the left side.

Also, you should be able to come up with another relationship between ##\sigma_1## and ##\sigma_2## using the fact that the total charge on the conductor is given to be ##Q##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and alan123hk
Will it look like the picture below?
A12.jpg
 
alan123hk said:
Will it look like the picture below?
I don't understand this picture. Volume charge density ##\rho## is not relevant to this problem.

You made a good start in your first post where you got a relation between the surface charge densities based on the fact that ##E## must equal zero inside the conductor. However, there is a sign error in your relation
1653484077758.png


Once you make the correction, this relation gives you one equation for the two unknowns ##\sigma_1## and ##\sigma_2##. The total charge ##Q## of the conductor and the the charge density ##\sigma## of the plane are considered as known.

Try finding another equation involving ##\sigma_1## and ##\sigma_2## based on the idea that the net charge of the conductor is ##Q##.
 
Sorry I was in a hurry so the description in my previous post was wrong. By the way, I'm not the OP of this thread, I'm just interested in this question.

This is my answer after much deliberation. I believe this time should not go wrong.

A13.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
alan123hk said:
By the way, I'm not the OP of this thread, I'm just interested in this question.
Yes, I mistakenly assumed you were the OP. It has been several days without any response from the OP.

Your solution is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and alan123hk

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K