Charge dependence of operators in QED renormalization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the charge dependence of operators in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) renormalization, specifically how to determine the dependence of 1-loop corrections on the bare charge ##e##. The effective QED Lagrangian is given as ##\mathcal{L}_{\Lambda} = \bar{\psi}_{\Lambda}(i\not \partial - m_{\Lambda})\psi_{\Lambda} - \frac{1}{4}(F^{\mu\nu}_{\Lambda})^2 - e_{\Lambda}\bar{\psi}_{\Lambda}\not A_{\Lambda}\psi_{\Lambda}##. Participants explore the systematic approach to identifying the ##e## dependence of operators such as ##\bar{\psi}(\partial^2 F^{\mu\nu})\sigma_{\mu\nu}\psi## and ##\bar{\psi}\partial_{\mu}F^{\mu\nu}\gamma_{\nu}\psi## through the construction of 1-loop Feynman diagrams. The challenge lies in developing an intuition for how these diagrams relate to the operators and their charge dependencies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian formalism in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of Feynman diagrams and their construction
  • Basic concepts of renormalization in quantum field theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction of 1-loop Feynman diagrams in QED
  • Research the role of gauge invariance in QED operators
  • Learn about the implications of charge renormalization in quantum field theories
  • Explore the relationship between operator dimensions and their contributions to 1-loop corrections
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physics researchers, and graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of QED renormalization and operator analysis.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552
Hi all. Consider a UV cutoff regulator ##\Lambda## with an effective QED lagrangian ##\mathcal{L}_{\Lambda} = \bar{\psi}_{\Lambda}(i\not \partial - m_{\Lambda})\psi_{\Lambda} - \frac{1}{4}(F^{\mu\nu}_{\Lambda})^2 - e_{\Lambda}\bar{\psi}_{\Lambda}\not A_{\Lambda}\psi_{\Lambda}##. One can of course add more local operators to ##\mathcal{L}_{\Lambda}## by considering corrections from various 1-loop diagrams of the full theory. The ##\Lambda## dependence of these 1-loop corrections is easy to determine from the dimension of the operator.

But how does one systematically go about determining the dependence on the bare charge ##e## of the 1-loop corrections given the operators? For example, if I have the operator ##\bar{\psi}(\partial^2 F^{\mu\nu})\sigma_{\mu\nu}\psi## or the operator ##\bar{\psi}\partial_{\mu}F^{\mu\nu}\gamma_{\nu}\psi## or even ##\bar{\psi}\not D^3 \psi## (which are allowed by the theory since they respect gauge invariance, Lorentz invariance, and parity) how can I tell how the associated 1-loop correction will depend on ##e##?

One obvious thing to do would be to try and construct the 1-loop Feynman diagrams that these operators are generated by in the full theory and get the ##e## dependence by looking at the number of vertices but I do not have a good enough intuition to do this. For example what Feynman diagrams would generate the three operators above?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K