Charge Invariance & Mass Dependence: Lorentz Transformations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter QuArK21343
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
QuArK21343
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Why is it that charge is Lorentz invariant (it's a scalar, independent of the frame of reference) whereas mass is not? Does this mean that the gravitational force a body exerts depends on the frame of reference, whereas the electric force doesn't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, since this is new to me, could you clarify the difference between the two? Do you mean the rest mass is Lorentz invariant? Anyway, there is no analogue to relativistic mass as far as charge is concerned (no relativistic charge), right?
 
"Relativistic mass" is a highly misleading concept and should be avoided. Its use arose simply because the relativistic expression for the momentum happens to be p = γmv, and in trying to make look like the nonrelativistic formula it was written p = Mv where M = γm.

The Lorentz force equation can be written (τ is proper time)

dp/dτ = γe(E + v/c x B)

and sure enough there's the combination γe, but I would not recommend defining this as the "relativistic charge" either!