Charge near an ungrounded infinite conducting plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the problem of a point charge near an ungrounded infinite conducting plane at a potential V_0. It establishes that adding a constant potential does not affect the electric field or surface charge distribution, as only potential differences are physically significant. The method of images is recommended for calculating the potential and electric field, with specific equations provided for both grounded and ungrounded scenarios. The solution also addresses the implications of introducing a homogeneous surface charge and its effects on the overall potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the method of images in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of Gauss's Law and its applications
  • Basic calculus for integrating charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of images for various boundary conditions in electrostatics
  • Learn about the implications of surface charge density on electric fields
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as potential theory
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields near conducting surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electrostatics, particularly those interested in boundary value problems and electric field calculations near conductors.

jsphy
Sorry if this has been answered already, i searched for a while. I know how to solve the problem of the potential of a point charge near a grounded infinite conducting plane, and a line charge near an infinite conducting plane. If the plane isn't necessarily grounded, say its at some potential V_0, the how would you solve the problem Then. I was tempted to just say that its a constant term added to the original problem, since that wouldn't affect the electric field, or the surface charge on the plane, because those are derivatives of the potential and a constant term won't matter, but I am not sure if that is a valid argument, or if its correct. Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Specifying a potential for the plane conveys no information, because only potential differences have physical effect. If we add any constant to all potentials in a problem, no physical change occurs.

Perhaps the scenario you want to consider is, what if the plane has an average excess positive charge density of ##\rho## Coulombs per square metre. The question is then, what is it that you want to calculate, eg the electric field near the charge, or the distribution of charge on the plane near the charge, or some other measurable quantity?
 
You can first solve the problem with the method of images for the homogeneous boundary condition, i.e., for a grounded plane ##V(\vec{r})=0## for ##z=0## (making the ##xy## plane of the Cartesian coordinate system the conducting plane. On the side, where your point charge is located, you have the corresponding potential (assuming the charge is located at ##(0,0,z_Q)## with ##z_Q>0##
$$V_0(\vec{x})=\frac{Q}{4 \pi} \left (\frac{1}{|\vec{x}-z_Q \vec{e}_z|}+\frac{1}{|\vec{x}+z_Q \vec{e}_z|} \right ) \quad \text{for} \quad z>0.$$
On the other side of the plane, i.e., for ##z<0## you have ##V_0=0##.

Using Gauss's Law to the half-space ##z<0^+##, you immediately get the total influence charge as ##-Q##. You can also verify this by directly integrating over the surface charge, i.e., ##\sigma(x,y)=E_z(x,y,0^+)##.

Now you need to add for ##z>0## a field which doesn't spoil the boundary conditions to add an additional homogeneous surface charge (of course that's rather unphysical, because the total charge on the plane is infinite then). This obviously is achieved by adding a homogeneous field at ##z>0##:
$$V(\vec{x})=V_0(\vec{x})-\frac{\sigma_{\text{add}}}{2} z \quad \text{for} \quad z>0$$
and
$$V(\vec{x})=+\frac{\sigma_{\text{add}}}{2} z \quad \text{for} \quad z>0.$$
The latter solution can be found by first integrating a homogeneous surface-charge distribution along a finite square of length ##L## and then taking looking at the limit ##L \rightarrow 0##. You can subtract a constant diverging contribution from the potential to finally get the above solution.

Of course, the potential is still ##0## along the conducting plane, but as was stressed already above, an additive constant of the potential is physically irrelevant anyway.

The above solution has to be read as the approximate solution for a large conducting finite plane with the additional charge not too far away and looking at the field also not too close and beyond the edges. Then you just have a finite additional charge on the plane compared to the "grounded-plane solution".
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
556
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K