Charge on a particle to balance its weight

Click For Summary
To determine the necessary charge for a 1.45g particle to remain stationary in a downward electric field of 650 N/C, the charge must be negative to counteract the downward gravitational force. The correct approach involves using the acceleration due to gravity, g, as 9.81 m/s² instead of the gravitational constant. The calculation involves balancing the weight of the particle (mg) with the electric force (Eq). After correcting the units and using the proper value for g, the required charge is found to be approximately -21.9 µC. This discussion highlights the importance of using the correct constants and units in physics calculations.
Fluxthroughme
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
1. What must the charge of a 1.45g particle be for it to remain stationary when placed in a downward-directed electric field of magnitude 650N/C?



Homework Equations


E = \frac{F}{q}


The Attempt at a Solution



So the field is pointing downwards. E fields point in the direction a positive charge would take, so the charge must be negative to stay balanced. Gravity is also pointing downwards.

So I take the above formula, and I get F = Eq = ma
q = \frac{(1.45*10^{-3})*g}{650} = 1.488*10^{-16} C
(Using g = 6.67*10^{-11}) However the answer given is -21.9\mu C

Not sure what I'm doing wrong/missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey man welcome to physicsforums :)
Why are you using g=6.67*10^-11 ?

Edit: or, what units are these?
 
BruceW said:
hey man welcome to physicsforums :)
Why are you using g=6.67*10^-11 ?

I'm trying to balance the weight of the particle (mg) with the force from the electric field (Eq).

Thanks for the welcome ;D

Edit: the original particle is 1.45grams, so I use the 10^{-3} to convert that to kg. E is in N/C, and g, well I don't know :P Whatever the units of the gravitational constant are
 
Ohhhhh. I see what I've done! Doing dimensional analysis shows I have the wrong units; thanks for that.

I have to use 9.81 instead of the gravitational constant -_-

Thanks :P

Edit: Yeah, thanks ap123 :P I certainly won't make THAT mistake again ;D
 
g is the acceleration due to gravity, not the gravitational constant, ie g should be 9.80m/s2

Edit: OK - you've got it :)
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
955
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K