Charge to Mass Ratio Calculation for Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter koolmerliner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Mass Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge-to-mass ratio (q/m) of a small object projected into a uniform electric field of 600 N/C between parallel plates. The object, with an initial speed of 6.00×103 m/s, is deflected downward by 1.35 cm after traveling 56.0 cm. The calculations involve using the equations of motion and electric force, leading to a derived charge of 4.51 × 10-9 C and a mass of 8.668 × 10-13 kg, resulting in an incorrect initial q/m value of 5203. The discussion emphasizes the need to correctly apply the uniform electric field concept rather than a point charge model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and motion equations
  • Familiarity with electric fields and forces, specifically E = F/q
  • Knowledge of charge and mass relationships in physics
  • Ability to apply Newton's second law, F = ma
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of uniform electric fields and their properties
  • Learn how to derive charge-to-mass ratios in electric fields
  • Study kinematic equations in two-dimensional motion
  • Explore the implications of electric force on charged particles in motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and motion dynamics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to charge interactions in electric fields.

koolmerliner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small object with mass m, charge q, and initial speed v0 = 6.00×10^3 m/s is projected into a uniform electric field between two parallel metal plates of length 26.0 cm(Figure 1) . The electric field between the plates is directed downward and has magnitude E = 600 N/C . Assume that the field is zero outside the region between the plates. The separation between the plates is large enough for the object to pass between the plates without hitting the lower plate. After passing through the field region, the object is deflected downward a vertical distance d = 1.35 cm from its original direction of motion and reaches a collecting plate that is 56.0 cm from the edge of the parallel plates. Ignore gravity and air resistance.

Part A
Calculate the object's charge-to-mass ratio, q/m.

fdU8nnS.jpg


Homework Equations


E = F/q
E=kq/r^2
kinematics

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for q by using E = kq/r^2[/B]
Er^2/k = q
(600 N/C)(.26 m)^2 / 9x10^9 Nm^2/C^2 = q
q = 4.51 * 10^-9 C

My plan for mass is

Eq = F = ma
Eq/a = m

Using Kinematics
Solving for time t

x - x0 =1/2(v0x + vx)t
2(x-x0)/(v0x + vx) = t
2(.56m)/(2 * 6 *10^3 m/s) = t
t = 9.33*10^-5 s


Solving for Acceleration y-axis ay

y = y0 + v0yt + (1/2)ayt^2
2(y - y0 - v0yt)/t^2 = ay
2(.56m)/t^2 = ay
ay = 3127478 m/s


Eq/a = m

m = 8.668 * 10^-13 kg

q/m = 5203 wrong answer


 
Physics news on Phys.org
koolmerliner said:
2(.56m)/t^2 = ay
The acceleration only applies while between the plates. Break the problem into two parts.
 
And while you do what haruspex suggested, consider that the E-field in which the particle travels is not kq/r^2, which is the field generated by a point charge, but a uniform field of 600 N/C generated by external charges on the plates.
 
I tried solving for Vy(in plates) which is equal to V0y and Vy (outside the plates)
y-y0 = 1/2(2Vy)t
(-0.0135m)/t = Vy
t = 5 * 10^-5 s (outside the from 26 to 56) calculated wrong in post
Vy = (-0.0135m)/t = -270 m/s

Now solving for t (x=0 to x=.26m)
(x-x0) = (1/2)(v0x + v0x)t
(.26m)/(6.00 * 10^3 m/s) = t
t = 4.33*10^-5 s

ay = (-270m/s)/ t
ay = 6235565 m/s^2
 
Last edited:
A "previous question" is often an unreliable source. Here you don't have a line of charge, just a moving charge in a uniform electric field. The electric field in the line of charge question does not have the same dependence on space coordinates (it looks different if you draw field lines in space) as a uniform electric field, which is what you have here. Therefore, it is incorrect to use the line-of-charge of expression where it does not apply and expect to make sense out of it.

I have not done the math yet to see if your number for ay is correct. Assuming that it is, can you find an expression for ay in terms of the charge q, the external electric field E and the mass m?
 
kuruman said:
A "previous question" is often an unreliable source. Here you don't have a line of charge, just a moving charge in a uniform electric field. The electric field in the line of charge question does not have the same dependence on space coordinates (it looks different if you draw field lines in space) as a uniform electric field, which is what you have here. Therefore, it is incorrect to use the line-of-charge of expression where it does not apply and expect to make sense out of it.

I have not done the math yet to see if your number for ay is correct. Assuming that it is, can you find an expression for ay in terms of the charge q, the external electric field E and the mass m?

ay = qE/m
 
Right. Now look at the equation. What quantity are you trying to find and how can you write it in terms of known quantities?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K