Charged Particle in Magnetic field calculation

  • #1

Homework Statement



Basically having a problem when trying to theoretically calculate the mass of alpha particle in a charged field.

r is the unknown radius of curvature
m = mass of an alpha particle (6.646 *10^-27 kg)
v = velocity of an alpha particle immediatly after decay (1.381 *10^7 m/s)
q = charge of an alpha particle (3.2 *10^-19 C)
B = magnetic field strength (0.005 Tesla)

Homework Equations



r=mv/qB

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Answer should be around 1cm but instead value is around 79cm. What's going wrong, am I forgetting something obvious. 1cm is published everywhere and was similar to my experimental results.

Thanks
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
896
637
What is r? Circular orbit? State more accuratelly all data and unknown ...
 
  • #3
896
637
+ check the equation and in the proper unit system ...
 
  • #4
+ check the equation and in the proper unit system ...
What is r? Circular orbit? State more accuratelly all data and unknown ...
Thanks Stavros I've updated it would and it checks out fully with the SI unit of equations, is there any value I've used that seems blindingly wrong to you?
 
  • #5
896
637
Thanks Stavros I've updated it would and it checks out fully with the SI unit of equations, is there any value I've used that seems blindingly wrong to you?
Seems ok now. Values also seem ok and the equation is correct (comes from Lorentz force and circular motion). Did you convert cm to m properly (for SI units - not CGS)? Perhaps 79cm is 0.79 or something ... (I didn't do the calculation). You check it first, all units converted properly in SI ...
 
  • #6
Seems ok now. Values also seem ok and the equation is correct (comes from Lorentz force and circular motion). Did you convert cm to m properly (for SI units - not CGS)? Perhaps 79cm is 0.79 or something ... (I didn't do the calculation). You check it first, all units converted properly in SI ...
Yeah, annoying thing is that I've done exactly that but the answer just comes out wrong..., even then 79cm is quite a way off of 1cm
 
  • #7
gneill
Mentor
20,925
2,867
What is the source of your data for the velocity of the alpha particle and the strength of the magnetic field? Those two would appear to be the only things in your scenario that are not intrinsic properties of the particle.
 
  • #8
What is the source of your data for the velocity of the alpha particle and the strength of the magnetic field? Those two would appear to be the only things in your scenario that are not intrinsic properties of the particle.

The field is just an exemplar of a lowly induced field and the velocity calculation is considerably more complex: (see picture)

This value is also similar to one found on Wikipedia (I know the source is awful I couldn't find it anywhere else)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-12-26 at 21.49.41.png
    Screen Shot 2016-12-26 at 21.49.41.png
    50.1 KB · Views: 424
  • #9
gneill
Mentor
20,925
2,867
The depicted velocity calculation is a bit overly detailed for the present purpose, but gives a value that seems reasonable to me. It essentially apportions the energy released according to the masses of the daughter particles (radium nucleus and alpha particle). That just leaves the magnetic field to wonder about.

For the velocity attributed to the alpha particle, what magnetic field strength would result in a trajectory radius of about 1 cm? It would have to be much larger than 0.005 T.

1cm is published everywhere and was similar to my experimental results.
Can you point us to an example of this published value?
 
  • #10
896
637
I agree. Your data can be the only source of the inconsistency.
 

Related Threads on Charged Particle in Magnetic field calculation

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
14K
Top