Charges/Coulomb's Law/Electric Fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter calcuseless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small mass suspended from a thread in the presence of a horizontal electric field. Participants are tasked with calculating the charge on the mass while considering the effects of both electric and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to account for both electric and gravitational forces, suggesting the use of free body diagrams and the resolution of forces in two dimensions. Questions arise about the correct application of trigonometric functions in the context of tension and force components.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces acting on the mass, with some participants offering guidance on how to set up the equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem statement are being considered, particularly regarding the mass measurement.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the mass being stated as "2g," questioning whether it should be interpreted differently. This highlights potential ambiguity in the problem setup that may affect calculations.

calcuseless
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The picture shows a small 2g mass suspended from a massless thread. When a horizontal electric field of 2000 N/C pointing left to right is applied, the mass moves to the position shown and then comes to a stop. Calculate the magnitude of the charge on the mass.

http://imgur.com/3uSDc

Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law: F= (k*q1*q2)/r2
F=qE

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the charge is negative by the picture, but I can't use these equations without more information. Am I missing an equation I should know or just a concept that let's me ignore something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If there were no gravity, the charged mass would be pushed straight out. It hangs at an angle dependent of the strength of the electric force AND the gravitational force on the mass. Those forces are are in perpendicular directions, so you have a 2D problem to deal with. Begin with a sketch of all the forces and write that the sum of the forces is zero in the horizontal direction, and also in the vertical direction. Usually in these 2D problems you have to work with the two equations together as a system to find the answer.
 
Hello calcuseless,
calcuseless said:
I know the charge is negative by the picture, but I can't use these equations without more information. Am I missing an equation I should know or just a concept that let's me ignore something?
Yes, also consider the force of gravity, and the tension on the string.

Draw a free body diagram. You'll have 3 forces acting on the mass. The electric force, gravity and the tension. You can break up the tension into its components and solve the the answer.

[Edit Delphi51 beat me to the post. Serves me right for getting a cup of coffee in the middle of posting. :smile:]
 
Ty - Fg = 0
Ty = m * g
sin(40°) = m * g
sin(40°) = .002kg * 9.8N

Tx - FE = 0
Tx = q * E
cos(40°) = q * E
cos(40°) = q * 2000N/C
q = cos(40°) / 2000N/C
q = 3.83 * 10-4 Coulombs

Is this correct?

Should Tx = m * g * cos(40°) instead?
 
Last edited:
sin(40°) = m * g
should be T*sin(40°) = m * g
Same for the horizontal.

Since T appears in both equations, you'll have to solve one of them for T and then substitute the expression into the other equation to eliminate T. I have a much smaller answer for q.
 
calcuseless said:
Should Tx = m * g * cos(40°) instead?
No, not quite. You need to break the tension up, not the force of gravity!
Delphi51 said:
should be T*sin(40°) = m * g
That's not quite right either. Correct, you need to put the T in there multiplied by the trig function, but care needs to be taken about using the correct trig function.

Take a look at where the angle is (this time it is not with respect to the x-axis, but rather with respect to the y-axis). Remember that

sinθ = opposite/hypotenuse

cosθ = adjacent/hypotenuse

(And eventually, [you'll need this later] tanθ = sinθ/cosθ = opposite/adjacent)
 
And something that might be worth double checking, in addition to the above post(s):

In the OP and in the figure, m = 2g. If that is what the problem statement is, than that is what it is. But it just strikes me as a little weird. It would make more common sense to me if the mass was 2/g. As in m = (2 [N])/g. Before giving your final answer, it might be worth double checking the original problem statement and verifying for sure that it states "m = 2g."
 
Thank you very much for catching the sin/cos error, collinsmark!
I read the mass "2g" to be 2 grams . . .
 
Delphi51 said:
Thank you very much for catching the sin/cos error, collinsmark!
I read the mass "2g" to be 2 grams . . .
Grams! That's it. :smile: Never-mind my previous post. Grams. :blushing:
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K