MHB Is the Convergence of These Sequences Correctly Determined?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The convergence of the sequences defined as $\displaystyle{f_n:=\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{3n+1}}$ and $\displaystyle{g_n:=(-1)^n+\frac{\sin n}{n}}$ has been analyzed. The limit of $f_n$ converges to $e^{-\frac{3}{2}}$, confirmed through the application of limit properties and the exponential limit definition. Conversely, the sequence $g_n$ does not converge, as its subsequences $g_{2n}$ and $g_{2n+1}$ approach different limits (1 and -1, respectively), indicating divergence. The calculations and justifications provided are accurate and complete.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of subsequences and their convergence behavior
  • Ability to apply limit theorems such as the multiplication and composition rules
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential limits, specifically $\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{x}{n}\right)^n$
  • Learn about subsequence convergence and its implications in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of oscillating sequences and their limits
  • Investigate the application of the Squeeze Theorem in limit evaluation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus, particularly those studying sequences and series convergence.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Check the below sequences for convergence and determine the limit if they exist. Justify the answer.

  1. $\displaystyle{f_n:=\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{3n+1}}$
  2. $\displaystyle{g_n:=(-1)^n+\frac{\sin n}{n}}$
I have done the following:
  1. $\displaystyle{f_n:=\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{3n+1}}$

    We have that:
    \begin{align*}\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{3n+1}&=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{2n}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{n}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{1} \\ & =\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{2n}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left [\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{2n}\right ]^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right ) \\ & =\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{2n}\cdot \left [\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{2n}\right ]^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right ) \\ & =\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1+\frac{(-1)}{2n}\right )^{2n}\cdot \left [\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1+\frac{(-1)}{2n}\right )^{2n}\right ]^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )\end{align*}

    From definition, it holds that $\displaystyle{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1+\frac{x}{n}\right )^n=e^x}$.

    We calculate the limit $\displaystyle{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1+\frac{(-1)}{2n}\right )^{2n}}$ :

    Let $m:=2n$. If $n\rightarrow \infty$ then $m\rightarrow \infty$.

    So we get:
    \begin{equation*}\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1+\frac{(-1)}{2n}\right )^{2n}=\lim_{m\rightarrow \infty}\left (1+\frac{(-1)}{m}\right )^{m}=e^{-1}\end{equation*}

    Now we consider the limit $\displaystyle{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )}$ :

    It holds the following:
    \begin{equation*}\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}1-\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{2n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}1-\frac{1}{2}\cdot \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{n}=1-\frac{1}{2}\cdot 0=1-0=1\end{equation*}

    So we get:
    \begin{equation*}\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}f_n=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\left (1-\frac{1}{2n}\right )^{3n+1}=e^{-1}\cdot \left [e^{-1}\right ]^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot 1=e^{-1}\cdot e^{-\frac{1}{2}}=e^{-1-\frac{1}{2}}=e^{-\frac{3}{2} }\end{equation*} Is everything correct? So we have checked the convergence by calculating the limit, right? But how can we justify the answer? (Wondering)
  2. Could you give me a hint for that one? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Is everything correct? So we have checked the convergence by calculating the limit, right? But how can we justify the answer? (Wondering) [*] Could you give me a hint for that one? (Wondering)
[/LIST]

Justify... Didn't you just do that?

That one - Does a pulsar hold still?
 
So is the first limit complete and correct? (Wondering) About the second limit, is it as follows?

It holds that $\displaystyle{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sin n}{n}=0}$.

$(-1)^n$ is $1$ for even $n$ and $-1$ for odd $n$. So $\displaystyle{(-1)^n+\frac{\sin n}{n}}$ is $1+0=1$ for even $n$ and $-1+0=-1$ for odd $n$.

So $g_{2n} = 1$ and $g_{2n+1} = -1$.

The subsequences $g_{2n}$ and $g_{2n+1}$ have different limits ($\lim g_{2n} = 1$ and $\lim g_{2n+1} = -1$), therefore the limit $\lim g_n$ doesn't exist. Is that correct? (Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mathmari said:
So is the first limit complete and correct?

It looks complete and correct to me. (Nod)
You have applied to multiplication and composition rules for limits, which is correct since all limits exist, and since the function in the composition is continuous. (Nerd)

mathmari said:
About the second limit, is it as follows?

It holds that $\displaystyle{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sin n}{n}=0}$.

$(-1)^n$ is $1$ for even $n$ and $-1$ for odd $n$. So $\displaystyle{(-1)^n+\frac{\sin n}{n}}$ is $1+0=1$ for even $n$ and $-1+0=-1$ for odd $n$.

So $g_{2n} = 1$ and $g_{2n+1} = -1$.

The subsequences $g_{2n}$ and $g_{2n+1}$ have different limits ($\lim g_{2n} = 1$ and $\lim g_{2n+1} = -1$), therefore the limit $\lim g_n$ doesn't exist. Is that correct?

I think you meant that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}g_{2n} = 1$ and $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}g_{2n+1} = -1$, didn't you? Because $g_{2n} \ne 1$.
Otherwise it's all correct. (Nod)
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K