Checking the linear independence of elements of 2 X 2 matrices

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around checking the linear independence of elements of 2x2 matrices, specifically focusing on the relationships between three matrices represented as |1>, |2>, and |3>. Participants explore various methods to determine linear independence and the implications of overdetermined systems.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of coefficients to express one matrix in terms of others and question if there are simpler methods. There is mention of solving systems of equations derived from the matrices and checking the resulting coefficients.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants exploring different interpretations of linear independence and the implications of overdetermined systems. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definition of linear independence and the nature of solutions in such systems, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of linear independence, with some confusion around terminology and the implications of overdetermined systems. There are references to specific equations and matrix forms, indicating a focus on mathematical rigor.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2018-8-13_19-51-53.png


Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
## |3 \rangle = |1 \rangle - 2 ~ |2 \rangle ##
So, they are not linearly independent.

One way to find the coefficients is :
## |3 \rangle = a~ |1 \rangle +b~ |2 \rangle ## ...(1)
And solve (1) to get the values of a and b.

Is there any other easier way?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-13_19-51-53.png
    upload_2018-8-13_19-51-53.png
    15.8 KB · Views: 1,040
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
One way to find the coefficients is :
## |3 \rangle = a~ |1 \rangle +b~ |2 \rangle ## ...(1)
And solve (1) to get the values of a and b.

Is there any other easier way?
It doesn't get much easier than that. Since ##a## and ##b## are overdetermined, you can choose two elements from each matrix (the right column from each, for example) and solve the reduced problem

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1\\0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a\\b \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -1\\-2 \end{bmatrix}##

and then check the resulting ##a## and ##b## on the left columns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
Pushoam said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 229238

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
## |3 \rangle = |1 \rangle - 2 ~ |2 \rangle ##
So, they are not linearly independent.

One way to find the coefficients is :
## |3 \rangle = a~ |1 \rangle +b~ |2 \rangle ## ...(1)
And solve (1) to get the values of a and b.

Is there any other easier way?
I think you have done things the easiest way -- by inspection.

Another way is to use the definition of linear independence. The matrices A, B, and C (which you are calling |1>, |2>, and |3>) are linearly independent if there is only the nontrivial solution for the constants in the equation ##c_1A + c_2B + c_3C = 0##. By nontrivial, I mean solutions other than ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
tnich said:
It doesn't get much easier than that. Since ##a## and ##b## are overdetermined, you can choose two elements from each matrix (the right column from each, for example) and solve the reduced problem

##\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1\\0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a\\b \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -1\\-2 \end{bmatrix}##and then check the resulting ##a## and ##b## on the left columns.
I did not understand what you meant by "##a## and ##b## are overdetermined". When to use this concept in general?
 
Pushoam said:
I did not understand what you meant by "##a## and ##b## are overdetermined". When to use this concept in general?
An overdetermined problem is one in which you have more equations than variables. In this particular case you have four linear equations to solve for two variables.
##0a+b=-2\\a+b=-1\\0a+0b=0\\0a+b=-2##
or
##\begin{bmatrix}0 &1\\1&1\\0&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end {bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}-2\\-1\\0\\-2\end{bmatrix}##

In general such a system of equations can have no solutions, one solution, or an infinite number of solutions. There are no solutions if and only if the vectors are independent. You can use Gauss-Seidel to determine this. Or you can try to find a set of linearly independent rows (easy in this case) in the leftmost matrix, remove the other rows (on both sides), and solve the reduced problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
tnich said:
An overdetermined problem is one in which you have more equations than variables. In this particular case you have four linear equations to solve for two variables.
##0a+b=-2\\a+b=-1\\0a+0b=0\\0a+b=-2##
or
##\begin{bmatrix}0 &1\\1&1\\0&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end {bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}-2\\-1\\0\\-2\end{bmatrix}##

In general such a system of equations can have no solutions, one solution, or an infinite number of solutions. There are no solutions if and only if the vectors are independent. You can use Gauss-Seidel to determine this. Or you can try to find a set of linearly independent rows (easy in this case) in the leftmost matrix, remove the other rows (on both sides), and solve the reduced problem.
It is pretty easy in this case. The first equation says that ##0 a + b = -2##, so ##b = -2.## The second equation says that ##a+b = - 1\: \Rightarrow a = -1 - b = -1 + 2 = 1.## Now check if these values of ##a## and ##b## satisfy the third and fourth equations.
 
Mark44 said:
I think you have done things the easiest way -- by inspection.

Another way is to use the definition of linear independence. The matrices A, B, and C (which you are calling |1>, |2>, and |3>) are linearly independent if there are nontrivial solutions for the constants in the equation ##c_1A + c_2B + c_3C = 0##. By nontrivial, I mean solutions other than ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0##.
I think you probably wanted to write "linearly dependent " instead of "linearly independent".
 
Pushoam said:
I think you probably wanted to write "linearly dependent " instead of "linearly independent".
Yes, I did. I'll fix my original post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K