Chi Meson's Home Solar System Success Story

AI Thread Summary
A 7kW solar panel system has been installed, expected to cover 110% of electrical needs with a grid intertie and no batteries, costing $109/month for 15 years. The system is designed to produce optimal energy during peak demand times, particularly in summer. New legislative incentives in Connecticut will provide higher credits for excess energy produced, encouraging larger installations. Monitoring of the system's output will be essential, especially during winter months when snow can affect efficiency. Overall, the homeowner is optimistic about the financial and environmental benefits of the solar setup.
  • #51
Chi Meson said:
Turns out, they forgot to connect a wire! The entire grid over the garage was not connected! I've been getting less than half the kWh for two months!

Nitwits!

I'd be pissed. Maybe you should prorate their pay.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Pengwuino said:
Glad to hear you're producing some real power :) How many kWh per month do you think you're producing when it's at it's correct power output?

I should have 7 months over 800 kWh, with 3 of them over 900 kWh. Mid-December to Mid January will dip to about 400 kWh. The first year should be more than that, since panels decrease in efficiency by 10% . So far, the first 30-days-fully-conected will easily break 800.
 
  • #53
Milestone: April 13, first time breaking 40 kWh in one day.
 
  • #56
mheslep said:
Over 40% in the lab or on Mars rover. Off the shelf tops out at 20%.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...eff(rev120404).jpg/660px-PVeff(rev120404).jpg

Chi Meson said:
NASA is still keeping Alien technology for itself. jerks.
Or they are available to anybody who can afford them. Perhaps they're outrageously expensive, but still cheaper than the cost of the extra rocket fuel required to hoist larger, heavier, less efficient cells into orbit.

Disclaimer: this is simply a reasonable guess on my part.
 
  • #57
Update:

Yesterday the system surpassed 5 MWh. I'll be on track to smash the 7MWh per year expectation. According to the law as it stands, I do not get credit for a net positive yearly production; the best I am allowed is to break even. Since the system is leased, the actual owners might be under a different law. I tried to read the legal jargon, but I fell into a coma.

My only recourse is to use MORE electricity! How [messed up] is that?

Interesting observation: the highest level of production is during March/April, where the power went over 7000W under full sun. The heat of May, June, July, August keeps the power near 6000W maximum, but this lasts for 8 to 10 hours. Record for kWh/day: 48
 
  • #58
Chi Meson said:
Yesterday the system surpassed 5 MWh. I'll be on track to smash the 7MWh per year expectation. According to the law as it stands, I do not get credit for a net positive yearly production; the best I am allowed is to break even. Since the system is leased, the actual owners might be under a different law. I tried to read the legal jargon, but I fell into a coma.

My only recourse is to use MORE electricity! How [messed up] is that?

That IS utterly messed up!

Thanks for the update. Is this the only place where we can get update on your progress, or do you blog your experience elsewhere also? It's very interesting to read what you are doing and going through, and I'm following it closely.

Zz.
 
  • #59
Chi Meson said:
...My only recourse is to use MORE electricity! How [messed up] is that?

Maybe it is time for a Nissan Leaf?
 
  • #60
This is it. I do not blog.

I. do. not. blog.

I use facebook primarily for communication with my robotics team, but PF is my only "community" online. Lucky You!

I've just found out that the grid inter-tie will prevent me from using solar during an area blackout. The inverter is very, very sensitive, and can only switch on after analyzing the incoming grid for 5 minutes (it's got to be synchronized precisely). I'm wondering if I can trick it by plugging in a gas generator.
 
  • #61
IMP said:
Maybe it is time for a Nissan Leaf?

That, or plug in Prius, or Chevy Volt... yes, I have moved that consideration way up the ladder.
 
  • #62
I love this thread! :smile:

Chi Meson said:
I've just found out that the grid inter-tie will prevent me from using solar during an area blackout. The inverter is very, very sensitive, and can only switch on after analyzing the incoming grid for 5 minutes (it's got to be synchronized precisely). I'm wondering if I can trick it by plugging in a gas generator.

It might be because of islanding concerns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islanding#Islanding_basics
 
  • #63
rootX said:
I love this thread! :smile:

It might be because of islanding concerns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islanding#Islanding_basics

Well, that's Wikipedia for you. A much more coherent and understandable explanation than the technical papers I was given. The safety concerns in my techie literature are treated as foregone conclusions, though. Wiki says "meh."
 
  • #64
Maybe you could have a line installed and metered to one of your neighbors then sell them a little power? :devil:
 
  • #65
Chi Meson said:
This is it. I do not blog.

I. do. not. blog.

I use facebook primarily for communication with my robotics team, but PF is my only "community" online. Lucky You!

I've just found out that the grid inter-tie will prevent me from using solar during an area blackout. The inverter is very, very sensitive, and can only switch on after analyzing the incoming grid for 5 minutes (it's got to be synchronized precisely). I'm wondering if I can trick it by plugging in a gas generator.

How about a $40 inverter run off of a $60 deep cycle battery kept charged by a single panel?

Solutions are $100 a dozen. :wink:

Though you'd need a solid disconnect from the grid. I'm pretty sure that's why they designed them the way yours is.

...

Have you ever connected a pair of multi-kilo/megawatt power sources out of phase before?

No?

Well, neither have I.

Though I did shoot a plasma fireball across the aux-room one day, about 30+ years ago...

450 vac x 1200 amps = BOOM!

We survived. :redface:
 
  • #66
OmCheeto said:
Though I did shoot a plasma fireball across the aux-room one day, about 30+ years ago...

450 vac x 1200 amps = BOOM!

We survived. :redface:

I must try that!
 
  • #67
OmCheeto said:
Have you ever connected a pair of multi-kilo/megawatt power sources out of phase before?
...

Though I did shoot a plasma fireball across the aux-room one day, about 30+ years ago...

450 vac x 1200 amps = BOOM!

We survived. :redface:

Ever put a screwdriver blade across a pair of 440 volt phases?

I did. Screwdriver blade plasma fireball in my hands.
 
  • #68
Chi Meson said:
I should have 7 months over 800 kWh, with 3 of them over 900 kWh. Mid-December to Mid January will dip to about 400 kWh. The first year should be more than that, since panels decrease in efficiency by 10% . So far, the first 30-days-fully-conected will easily break 800.
Total Money Earned in a Year
(7*800 + 3*900 + 2*400)*0.18$ = 1638$/yr
(or is it 0.55$/Kwh ?)
Total Money Paid
For Panels: 109$*12 = 1308$
For Electricity Use during Night + Cloudy Day = ?

Really, you should consider Selling it to neighbor at low rates, if the power company won't allow you go beyond break even.

I would like to hear more about the economic aspects.
Thanks.
 
  • #69
OmCheeto said:
Though I did shoot a plasma fireball across the aux-room one day, about 30+ years ago...

450 vac x 1200 amps = BOOM!

We survived. :redface:

dlgoff said:
Ever put a screwdriver blade across a pair of 440 volt phases?

I did. Screwdriver blade plasma fireball in my hands.

I once crossed a screwdriver on live 480 3-phase line. Same thing, the screwdriver was just a fireball. I was incredibly lucky. Turned out a physician had turned on the power! Never considered that one and we didn't have a lockout at that clinic. In fact, I didn't even know he was in there. I just happened to be holding the wires by the insulation when he turned on the power.

As for the current, typical industrial circuit breakers can take up to three cycle before they break. I would have to look to be sure of the numbers but this was typically true of high amp fuses as well - say a 400 amp fuse. So until the breaker cuts or the fuse burns, you can pull tens or even hundreds of thousands of amps for a short time depending on the facility. This is why parallel power cables can be so dangerous. In a failure mode, the repulsive forces between the cables can be lethal.
 
  • #70
Nice, now all you have to do is get a car like the Nissan Leaf and you can be almost entirely energy independent.
 
  • #71
gravenewworld said:
Nice, now all you have to do is get a car like the Nissan Leaf and you can be almost entirely energy independent.

I think I posted an email from our local EV club to that effect a while back:

BNY said:
JPC said:
7/20/2012
Greetings,
I finally got all the inspections and approvals today and am now generating electrons.
Whoo hoo


7/23/2012
Congrats! I turned on my system in March and it is totally cool to see my meter putting energy in the grid on a sunny day AND be able to charge my Leaf at the same time . . . charging my car on sunlight :smile:


:smile:
 
  • #72
Chi Meson said:
I've just found out that the grid inter-tie will prevent me from using solar during an area blackout. The inverter is very, very sensitive, and can only switch on after analyzing the incoming grid for 5 minutes (it's got to be synchronized precisely). I'm wondering if I can trick it by plugging in a gas generator.

It's possible but you need a dump load (a large battery bank can save the energy) to absorb power as the grid-tie inverter functions as a current source and will increase voltage to the trip-point of the generator (functioning as a voltage source) or inverter unless there is a load equal to the power output of the panels. There are hybrid grid-tie inverters that also have battery backup and allow the panels to generate power during a blackout but it's usually more cost effective just to run the generator.
 
  • #73
Is it even legal for you to be able to disconnect from the grid in a black out?

It has been several years since I had to abandon the solar idea, and I know much has changed since then, but if I remember right I would not have been able to have a system that could disconnect from the grid. I think I remember that it was possible to do easily, but it wasn't allowed. It never made sense.
 
  • #74
As a safety matter, any house can be disconnected from the grid. The issue must be either a matter of the electronics of the inverter due to load sharimg or seamlessness of the changeover. Such issues don't exist for home generators because they don't parallel the grid and turn on well after a power failure.

My guess is that to save money, the inverter doesn't come with a separate automated disconnect switch. It may also have to do with difficulty matching the load and capacity - not sure what happens if your AC asks for 5 kW and the array is only providing 3.
 
Last edited:
  • #75
gravenewworld said:
Nice, now all you have to do is get a car like the Nissan Leaf and you can be almost entirely energy independent.

Unlikely, not without adding batteries to his residential installation, or working a 3rd shift job or at home.

And even with the battery backup he'll be grid dependent in the winter, especially at Connecticut latitudes.

Chi Meson said:
The panels are up. 7kW system will be 110% of our electrical needs. Grid intertie, no batteries,...
...
Chi Meson said:
Batteries are not only unnecessary, they are "negatively beneficial" if talking 'bout environmental concerns OR financial concerns. The price of small inverters has come way the **** down, so it is much better to tie the solar output directly to the grid through the electric meter. When the panels crank out the kilowatts (mine is optimized for summer sun), the meter runs backward, and I get credit for the electricity I provide to the grid. At night, and in cloudy weather, the grid supplies electricity to me.


Received solar radiation kWh/M^2/day, Hartford, CT, flat plate tilted at latitude:
June: 5.3 avg, 6.2 max
Dec: 2.7 avg, 2.0 min

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/pubs/redbook/PDFs/CT.PDF
 
Last edited:
  • #77
There was a state/utility grant that paid about 1/3 of the cost and it was required to be for a "Net Zero" system. An additional panel was put in with the expectation that our use would increase as our 3 kids became 3 teenagers.

Not to mention, a missing panel would have been silly-looking (see first post).

But the panels are producing more this (dry) summer than the original estimates. Also, there's that thing about losing 10% of efficiency in the first 2 years. I don't think we'll maintain a net surplus for long.
 
  • #78
Pardon me, I just re-read what I typed...:blushing: I edited heavily before posting, and went too far. Didn't even realize I was completely wrong. Twice.

What I *MEANT* to say was that when the power went out, the system would automatically disconnect from the grid (so that electricians working on the lines would not get electrocuted) but that I couldn't use the power generated because of the way the disconnect works.

Ms Music said:
... I would not have been able to have a system that could disconnect from the grid...

Should have read "I would not have been able to have a system that could use generated power while disconnected from the grid." It wasn't legal with the current company and current local codes at the time. Is it the same for you?

(Sorry, communication is not my strong skill anymore!)
 
  • #79
russ_watters said:
Mheslep, the concept here is "net zero" energy...
Yes I know Connecticut and most states support net metering. Is that the same thing as being "energy independent"?
 
  • #80
Ms Music said:
Pardon me, I just re-read what I typed...:blushing: I edited heavily before posting, and went too far. Didn't even realize I was completely wrong. Twice.

What I *MEANT* to say was that when the power went out, the system would automatically disconnect from the grid (so that electricians working on the lines would not get electrocuted) but that I couldn't use the power generated because of the way the disconnect works...

Yet there are commonly available disconnect systems that switch automatically (or manually) from the grid to alternative power (generator, whatever), protecting utility lineman.
 
  • #81
Yes, I would have had to have a generator for when the grid went down.

Chi Meson said:
I've just found out that the grid inter-tie will prevent me from using solar during an area blackout. The inverter is very, very sensitive, and can only switch on after analyzing the incoming grid for 5 minutes (it's got to be synchronized precisely). I'm wondering if I can trick it by plugging in a gas generator.

This is what I am trying to understand, is it a legality thing, or an inverter thing? Is it something that can be changed to where you can use solar power during grid failure?
 
  • #82
A transfer switch, typically supplied with standby generators, that completely disconnects the residence from the grid would be required. Without a backup generator it is likely a different inverter (from the one Chi Meson describes) is needed that will free run without a grid voltage present.
 
Last edited:
  • #83
Ms Music said:
Yes, I would have had to have a generator for when the grid went down.
This is what I am trying to understand, is it a legality thing, or an inverter thing? Is it something that can be changed to where you can use solar power during grid failure?

It's an inverter thing as the grid-tie inverter designers make several assumptions about the AC power line connection. The primary one is that it assumes the grid is a infinite load sink that can take all the power the inverter can deliver so the control feedback loop parameter is inverter current (maximizing output) as the grid controls the voltage stability.
 
Last edited:
  • #84
Ahhh, I see!

Thanks to both of you.
 
  • #85
Interesting I am seriously considering this as an investment, I live in the UK, and it is sometimes sunny so it may just work. Of course it's not the tropics, or Arizona or Southern Spain. But I think solar power is a good idea, I am just dithering over the initial cost. We used to have subsidised power ie we got a nice little bonus for installing, unfortunately the Conservatives got in and even though this will supply power to the national grid in the long run, it won't make many rich people richer in the short term; so they got rid of the incentives. However this thread has kinda inspired me to dig deeper than idiots with a will to remove concessions, to long term strategies, because they want to appeal to morons with a will to buy more yachts. I thank you. I'm not a communist, but the conservatives really piss me off atm. I didn't vote for the con/lib idiots. I applaud your will to become more than just a number. :)
 
Back
Top