MHB Choose from the following set of vectors in R4

  • Thread starter Thread starter forzi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Vectors
forzi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I have a problem with this question:
Choose from the following set of vectors in R4 set of the maximum number of linearly independent vectors:
1.(1;2;3;4) 2.(2;4;6;8) 3.(0;1;-1;1) 4.(1;1;1;0) 5.(0;3;0;0)

So, I can find a rank of a matrix, it's 4, but I can't understand how it could help me answering my question.

Would you please help me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can just assume that cause second vector is equal 2*first vector, I can remove first vector from calculation and the answer will be 2,3,4,5
tBut it just an assumption.
 
Hi forzi and welcome to MHB! :D

I think you have the right idea but wouldn't one omit vectors 1. and 2.?
 
Hi greg

Thanks :)
I can't understand your question. But I can say that answer to my question is 2,3,4,5. I finished the test with this answer and it was right.
Have no idea why :confused:
 
Wouldn't vectors 1,3,4,5 be an equally good answer?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top