Choosing a partner in chemistry courses at a university or college

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the methods and criteria participants use to choose partners for chemistry courses at universities or colleges. It explores personal experiences, preferences, and the dynamics of working with different types of partners in a laboratory setting.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to avoid pairing with highly regarded individuals to prevent embarrassment, suggesting a preference for neutral and comfortable partners.
  • Another participant shares that pairing with friends may hinder productivity, as it can lead to slower work due to social dynamics.
  • Independence in a partner is valued by some, as it allows for efficient division of work without constant guidance.
  • Some participants note that grades may not accurately reflect a partner's practical abilities in the lab setting.
  • A participant mentions a tendency to choose partners perceived as more capable to maintain motivation and efficiency.
  • One participant highlights that in their experience, lab partners were often assigned rather than chosen, indicating a lack of choice in partner selection.
  • Another participant humorously suggests avoiding attractive partners and those who are barely competent to reduce anxiety and pressure.
  • One participant states that their lab partner was often determined by proximity on the first day, indicating a more random selection process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on partner selection, with no clear consensus on the best approach. Some emphasize the importance of independence and capability, while others reflect on the challenges of working with friends or assigned partners.

Contextual Notes

Participants' experiences and preferences vary widely, and the discussion reveals differing methods of partner selection based on personal dynamics and past experiences. There are unresolved considerations regarding the impact of social relationships on productivity.

Who May Find This Useful

Students in chemistry courses, educators interested in group dynamics, and individuals exploring collaboration strategies in academic settings may find this discussion relevant.

Jurrasic
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
What method do you use to pair up with a partner or multiple partners when taking a chemistry course?
What is it about the partner that you picked that made you pick them? :)

Does your method ever include avoiding people who you think are important so that you don't pair up with people who you could potentially embarrass yourself around if you screw up? Just to kind of pair up with people who you are totally neutral with and comfortable with? Or do you try to pair up with someone who you regard highly?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I dont' specialize in chemistry but I think choosing partners are more or less the same, here is my experience so far:

- pairing up with friends probably isn't a good idea, I always find that I get the work done the fastest with people I don't normally talk to. Maybe I tend to be bossy around my friends or something but with friends they always like to wait for me to say what to do next which makes everything slower etc. But basically being friends they will expect more room for error.

- grades don't reflect abilities. yeah, i thought grades can at least be some sort of reference, but no, sometimes no at all. being able to write down the right answers in an exam script doesn't mean the person can carry a flask from one bench to another without spilling half the contents on the floor and the other half on himself.

- this sounds weird but independence is what I look for. if someone can work by him/herself then we can just divid up the work and part ways, come back and summarise our work. I have meet a lot of people what are totally incapable of independent thought and asks for guidance/confirmation every step of the way, and that is not going to be efficient.

tbh, those points are everything I didn't do, I now have to work with someone that drives my blood pressure miles high everytime I'm in college. Things is, looking back on I should have picked up the signs years ago before I chose him as my work partner, so I only have myself to blame.

Given the choice I tend to pair up with someone who I think is more capable then I am, so there will be an ongoing pressure to keep up with them and things get done faster that way.

Good luck :)
 
You have a choice? Usually, in any physics/chemistry based labs that I've had, we rotated lab partners and it was chosen for us.
 
Two selection criteria to avoid:

"choose lookers",

"Work with the barely competent: it eliminates the anxiety of slacking off"..


If that doesn't give you sufficient insight, pick the smartest person(s) who will work with you.
 
For a lab, it normally ended up being whoever I was standing next to on the first day
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K