Choosing the Best Test for Exponentiality for Sample Size of 150

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mark J.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
Mark J.
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hi,
If I have a sample of 150 data how to chose between tests of exponentiality?
I mean is there any way to find the most appropriate test for my case judging on my data number,or maybe skewness, kurtosis, etc?
Or there are 2 or 3 frequently used tests (Pearson maybe) which are most used?

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark J. said:
Hi,
If I have a sample of 150 data how to chose between tests of exponentiality?
I mean is there any way to find the most appropriate test for my case judging on my data number,or maybe skewness, kurtosis, etc?
Or there are 2 or 3 frequently used tests (Pearson maybe) which are most used?

Please help

There is no mathematical answer to the "most appropriate" way until you define how to measure appropriateness. Even if you do that, there won't be be any mathematical answer unless you are willing to specify ( i.e. assume, guess, etc.) the exact way in which the data might be non-exponential.

If you reveal the nature of the data, someone might know from experience what tests have worked well for them on data of that particular type. ("Worked well" can have various meanings too. It might mean "produced a publishable result", "pleased my thesis advisor" "was approved by a government agency", etc.)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top