Choosing the Contour for the Cauchy Integral in Fourier Transform of Norms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the Fourier transform of a function defined in terms of the norm, specifically f(‖x‖). Participants explore the application of the Cauchy theorem and contour integrals in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Cauchy theorem and various contour integrals, including rectangular and semicircular contours. There is a focus on the analytical properties of the function involved, particularly questioning the holomorphic nature of f(z) = 1/(1 + |z|).

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the analytical properties of the function and discussing potential contours for integration. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of using norms in different dimensions and the challenges posed by the non-analytic nature of certain functions. The discussion includes considerations of LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions.

emra1976
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Compute the Fourier transform of a function of norm f(\norm{x}).


Homework Equations


\mathbb{F}{\frac{1}{1+\norm{x}}

The Attempt at a Solution


Attempt at using Cauchy theorem and the contour integral with the contour [(-R,R),(R,R+ip),(R+ip,-R+ip),(-R+ip,-R)] does not seem to work.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
emra1976 said:

Homework Statement



Compute the Fourier transform of a function of norm f(\norm{x}).


Homework Equations


\mathbb{F}{\frac{1}{1+\norm{x}}

The Attempt at a Solution


Attempt at using Cauchy theorem and the contour integral with the contour [(-R,R),(R,R+ip),(R+ip,-R+ip),(-R+ip,-R)] does not seem to work.

Is x a scalar or a vector? If it is a scalar, do you mean |x| when you write norm(x)?
 
Yes, you are correct. While I need to generalise it to x\in\mathbb{R}^n I would like to start with the case in which

x\in \mathbb{R}

and

\norm{x}=\abs{x}
 
Emra1976, put ## or $$ tags around your tex (double characters on each end). You can check what it will look like by clicking the Go Advanced button and previewing your post.
 
emra1976 said:
Yes, you are correct. While I need to generalise it to x\in\mathbb{R}^n I would like to start with the case in which

x\in \mathbb{R}

and

\norm{x}=\abs{x}
To use LaTeX here at PF you need to put the right tags around your expressions, as in the following.

Inline LaTeX
Code:
##x\in \mathbb{R}##
or
[itex]x\in \mathbb{R}[/itex]

Standalone LaTeX (for lack of a better name for it)
Code:
$$x\in \mathbb{R}$$
or
[tex]x\in \mathbb{R}[/tex]
 
emra1976 said:
Yes, you are correct. While I need to generalise it to x\in\mathbb{R}^n I would like to start with the case in which

x\in \mathbb{R}

and

\norm{x}=\abs{x}
Alright. Let's just crank it out. Let ##f(x)=|x|##. Then, ##\displaystyle \mathcal{F}\left[f(x)\right](\xi)=\int\limits_{(-\infty,+\infty)}|x|e^{-2\pi i x\xi}~dx##. You tried the residue theorem, you said?
 
1) it should be $$f(x)=\frac{1}{1+\abs{x}}$$

2) I tried Cauchy theorem using the fact that $$f(z)=\frac{1}{1+\abs{z}}$$ is analytical. I tried both the rectangular contour $$([-R,R],[R,R+ip],[R+ip,-R+ip],[-R+ip,-R])$$ and the the countour of the semidisk centered on the origin with radius $$R$$.
 
emra1976 said:
1) it should be $$f(x)=\frac{1}{1+\abs{x}}$$

2) I tried Cauchy theorem using the fact that $$f(z)=\frac{1}{1+\abs{z}}$$ is analytical. I tried both the rectangular contour $$([-R,R],[R,R+ip],[R+ip,-R+ip],[-R+ip,-R])$$ and the the countour of the semidisk centered on the origin with radius $$R$$.

In TeX, just write |z|, not \abs(z).

The function z| is not an analytical function, so I don't think you can apply Cauchy directly.
 
Do you mean that $$\frac{1}{1+|z|}$$ is not analytical (used as homomorphic)?
If so, where are its poles?
 
  • #10
emra1976 said:
Do you mean that $$\frac{1}{1+|z|}$$ is not analytical (used as homomorphic)?
If so, where are its poles?

No poles, but it fails to satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so is not holomorphic.

However, you can write
[tex]F(w) = \int_{R} \frac{e^{-iwx}}{1+|x|} \, dx = 2\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\cos(w x)}{1+x} \, dx,[/tex]
and then extend the latter integrand to
[tex]\frac{\cos(w z)}{1+z},[/tex]
which IS analytic.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Now, given
$$f(z)=\frac{cos(\omega z)}{1+\omega z}$$
how would you choose the contour for the Cauchy Integral? My two choices would be

1) the quarter disk in the top right quadrant of the complex plane
2) a rectangular contour in the top right quadrant of the complex plane

but I get stacked with both (1) and (2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K