Choosing the Right Quantum Field Theory Book: Peskin or Mandl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beta3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Peskin Qft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of a suitable textbook for studying quantum field theory (QFT), specifically comparing Peskin and Schroeder's "Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" with Mandl and Shaw's "Quantum Field Theory." Participants share their experiences and opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of each book, considering factors such as comprehensiveness, difficulty, and specific topics covered.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Peskin and Schroeder is widely used in graduate courses and is considered more modern and comprehensive, though also more challenging than Mandl and Shaw.
  • One participant suggests that the choice may depend on the reader's background in physics, chemistry, mathematics, or engineering.
  • Another participant shares their positive experience with self-studying Peskin's book, indicating that it is manageable with some guidance.
  • Some argue that Mandl's book provides better treatment of classical subjects in QFT, while Peskin's contains more information on quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and related topics.
  • There is a suggestion that for quantum electrodynamics (QED) specifically, Mandl's book may be preferable.
  • A participant mentions an online course related to Peskin and Schroeder, providing additional resources for self-study.
  • Weinberg's "The Quantum Theory of Fields" is mentioned as a challenging but valuable resource, with some participants expressing concerns about its mathematical rigor.
  • Another book, "Quantum Field Theory for Mathematicians" by R. Ticciati, is mentioned, with one participant finding it difficult to read compared to the others.
  • Mandl is described as a great book by a participant who previously took a course using it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the merits of Peskin versus Mandl, with no clear consensus on which book is definitively better. Some favor Peskin for its depth and modern approach, while others advocate for Mandl's clarity on classical topics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for different learning contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants' recommendations are influenced by their personal experiences and backgrounds, which may not apply universally. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the subject matter and the specific needs of self-study versus guided learning.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum field theory, particularly those considering self-study or looking for textbook recommendations, may find this discussion helpful.

beta3
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peskin and Schroeder is used as the text for many grad courses in quantum field theory. It's more modern, more comprehensive, more difficult, and thicker than Mandl and Shaw.

Is this for self-study?

What is your background? Mainly physics? Chemistry? Mathematics? Egineeering?

There are some other books that you might want to try.

Regards,
George
 
Yes, it's for self-study, but my professor is helping me personally (I'm writing on a not yet specified subject a paper)

physics background, quantum mechanics (my most recent read book has been QM by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji


Do you think I can manage Peskin's book?
As I said, my professor is helping me, but he is not an expert on quantum physics.
 
Get Peskin, it's awesome. I'm reading it by myself, and I've managed so far. I'm on chapter 5, reading 9 and 15/16/17 as well.
 
If it can help you, I once took part in an online course on Peskin and Schroeder, and I put some material from that time online here:

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/patrick.vanesch/qftcoursePS/qftcoursemain.html

It contains (my personal) summaries of several chapters, and some resolved exercises. No guarantee of course (although some peers worked them through too, and didn't find clashes).
 
We're using Peskin and Shroeder in my QFT course. I guess I like it, but I get most of my material from lecture and the book just serves as a quick review. If you're going to attempt self study guided by a professor, I suggest you get Peskin and then try to model after an actual course (possibly something you find online).
 
The treatment of "classical" subjects in general QFT is much better done in Mandl's book. But Peskin's book has the advantage of containing much more info on QCD and related topics. However, for QED only (including one-loop order renormalization), i'd go for Mandl's book.

Daniel.

P.S. Weinberg's first volume of "The Quantum Theory of Fields" is really awesome.
 
dextercioby said:
The treatment of "classical" subjects in general QFT is much better done in Mandl's book. But Peskin's book has the advantage of containing much more info on QCD and related topics. However, for QED only (including one-loop order renormalization), i'd go for Mandl's book.
Daniel.
P.S. Weinberg's first volume of "The Quantum Theory of Fields" is really awesome.

Actually I do want to know about QFT and all of the field theories (QED, electroweak, QCD), so I ordered Peskin's (should be arriving tomorrow, can't wait :!) )

Isn't Weinberg's really tough? that's what i have heard
 
Regarding Weinberg: usually it takes some hardcore mathematics to make sense of some complicated physics. It's not really about the level of rigurosity, but of being correct to yourself and not admit heuristic approaches.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
How about the one by R.Ticciati "Quantum Field Theory for Mathematicians"
Cambridge University Press ISBN 7-5062-5095-0/O

I find it hard to read, how does that compare with the others?
 
  • #11
I took a course years ago using mandl, great book. Another about the same level is by Aitcheson and Hey.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K