Choosing when intitial velocity is zero

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which initial velocity can be defined as zero in different physics problems, specifically comparing projectile motion and work-energy theorem scenarios. Participants explore the implications of these definitions and their applicability in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the consistency of defining initial velocity as zero in projectile motion problems, suggesting that while a projectile may start at rest in a cannon, it is assigned a non-zero initial velocity upon leaving the cannon.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether the initial velocity in projectile motion is taken as the velocity at which the projectile exits the cannon, indicating a need for more detail on the examples discussed.
  • A third participant argues that the projectile's initial state of rest is not the focus, emphasizing that the relevant velocity is that at which it exits the cannon, influenced by the cannon's firing mechanism.
  • One participant challenges the assertion that initial velocity can always be considered zero in work-energy theorem problems, stating that they have encountered many instances where the initial velocity was not zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on when it is appropriate to define initial velocity as zero, indicating that multiple competing perspectives exist without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the definitions of initial velocity may depend on the specific context of the problem, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of these definitions across different scenarios.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I have a quick question about when we can define the initial velocity to be zero. For example, in projectile motion problems, even though we know that projectile is originally at rest in a cannon, we assign the initial velocity to be some number that we can work with. However, for problems involving the work-energy theorem, no matter whether the ball has some measurable velocity at the beginning, on earth, we say that the initial velocity is zero in order to conclude that the work done is opposite that of gravity. Therefore, it seems that we pick and choose to define when velocity is zero. Why can we say it's zero in one type of problem (like work-energy theorem problems) but not other problems (liek projectile motion problems)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A little clarification would be helpful. In the projectile motion problem, do you mean we give the initial velocity to be whatever velocity the projectile had when it left the barrel of the cannon? On the other hand, what kind of problem are you thinking of with the ball? Can you explain the example in some more detail?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
I have a quick question about when we can define the initial velocity to be zero. For example, in projectile motion problems, even though we know that projectile is originally at rest in a cannon, we assign the initial velocity to be some number that we can work with.

That's not necessarily true. If a projectile is at rest in the cannon's bore before firing, it's going to stay there until the cannon is fired. But, the projectile resting comfortably inside the cannon is not what's interesting about this situation.

As the projectile leaves the muzzle of the cannon, it's going to be traveling at some definite velocity, having been accelerated by the expanding gases produced by the burning of the propellant with which the projectile is fired. After the projectile leaves the muzzle, the expanding gases from the propellant are no longer assumed to be accelerating the projectile, hence its instantaneous velocity at that time can be taken as a constant.

After that, gravity, air drag, etc., may or may not influence the motion of the projectile, as required by the problem statement.

While it is true that some problems have been simplified for teaching purposes, not everything about a given problem is necessarily made up.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
However, for problems involving the work-energy theorem, no matter whether the ball has some measurable velocity at the beginning, on earth, we say that the initial velocity is zero in order to conclude that the work done is opposite that of gravity.
This is not always true in my experience. I have worked many such problems where the initial velocity was not zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K